Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53060
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=q5T8iSCAH0hHJc4Rb/Lb8ec28zeqJOU3+R5pj8UWCJqLDI33RYhKuEBYjrmGCOgo/w
         +F9iKPwT4BhQ3l7ktzVdBDnDVIUy3jK79ymo/viQL7R868wf9t0WPJ5hXTlZqj7Fr3r3
         UTS8MdkATmJVVAotOW1VgklVL/yg2/GOY2Des=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4DED0A9A.80202@lsces.co.uk>
References: <4DE7F179.5010402@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106030843370.9040@whisky>
	<4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106030920570.9040@whisky>
	<4DE89CD2.4040302@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106030937571.9040@whisky>
	<4DE9AA9B.3000108@sugarcrm.com>
	<BANLkTinxwduQXxBoLZuFzT_Wyfy-LGC6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<slrniunu3j.dic.dsp@experimentalworks.net>
	<4DEC02B6.60806@sugarcrm.com>
	<4DEC7FED.9000700@lsces.co.uk>
	<4DEC8570.1010904@sugarcrm.com>
	<4DECACFB.5000805@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTinv4Lg+KW-6e1RRygZc3aFeZzPEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DECBE94.7010502@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTikvu_krucNLtYbuSRxN7+_+4qNvEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DECD6BC.5050101@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTi=WTOS4A=jOK+KaaXE0it=ePYwwjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DECFC84.3080800@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTimvdhwzk3GDJUDdTS+CQi_NYmD+hQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DED04EC.2040907@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTimh3SF8txJJzMLxvCzSge+U7P+fMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DED0A9A.80202@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 19:43:07 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinxJgK=N_exde4NJbpOKid1wMUoiQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301e2f81e790e904a50ea21c
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward
From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs)

--20cf301e2f81e790e904a50ea21c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> Pierre Joye wrote:
>
>> ????
>>> >  http://httpd.apache.org/download.cgi
>>> >  Win32 Binary IS one of the few binaries Apache supply!!! Some
>>> government
>>> >  sites will ONLY allow that version to be installed:(
>>> >  PHP5.2 installs have then been approved for use with the official
>>> apache
>>> >  install, so are you saying we need to go back to even earlier builds
>>> of
>>> >  PHP5.2 to work with this?
>>>
>> I will repeat it a last time here, as I told it too many times
>> already, including to you. These binaries are convenience builds and
>> are by no mean official builds. That's not my word but the apache's
>> guys.
>>
>
> Please can you provide a link where THAT statement is made!
>
> The download page only makes reference to checking the security of a
> download by checking the signatures, and it is this level of security that
> is used is a statement that any of the downloads are 'clean' from what ever
> mirror source they are downloaded from. There is nothing on
> http://apache.favoritelinks.net//httpd/binaries/win32/README.html that
> says that the windows builds are anything other than approved distributions
> of the current builds of apache. Installation note for WAP have pointed new
> users to start with the apache download for MANY years so that is where new
> users will always start, and when an update is released, windows users are
> redirected once again to the download page.
>
>
you can read more about this here:
http://osdir.com/ml/php-windows/2011-04/msg00023.html

especially this:
http://marc.info/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=129646769502349&w=2

Tyrael

--20cf301e2f81e790e904a50ea21c--