Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:53027
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ul5aHkMOKQgQy7kzXXZdWj5xmO0fULaIOvVG2VMZDTgJq3RoYZqP5LDCslscABkIJx
         1cfacblRXPMjr15+7Clonq3nEUyPCafeiman7NqRy7ikj5AZ1383QWM9dhb3sDbE04GG
         aeohuLQE5kcfKMV3C4oMXHLUNV3atEnUWU5C8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DECD6BC.5050101@lsces.co.uk>
References: <4DE7F179.5010402@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106030843370.9040@whisky>
	<4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106030920570.9040@whisky>
	<4DE89CD2.4040302@sugarcrm.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1106030937571.9040@whisky>
	<4DE9AA9B.3000108@sugarcrm.com>
	<BANLkTinxwduQXxBoLZuFzT_Wyfy-LGC6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<slrniunu3j.dic.dsp@experimentalworks.net>
	<4DEC02B6.60806@sugarcrm.com>
	<4DEC7FED.9000700@lsces.co.uk>
	<4DEC8570.1010904@sugarcrm.com>
	<4DECACFB.5000805@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTinv4Lg+KW-6e1RRygZc3aFeZzPEdQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DECBE94.7010502@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTikvu_krucNLtYbuSRxN7+_+4qNvEA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DECD6BC.5050101@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:33:31 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=WTOS4A=jOK+KaaXE0it=ePYwwjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
> Pierre Joye wrote:
>>>
>>> If you can convince the IT departments of some of the archaic council
>>> sites
>>> > =A0I am having to deal with that they do not have to stress test ever=
y
>>> > part of
>>> > =A0a new system ... It's exactly the same argument FROM them as you a=
re
>>> > giving
>>> > =A0below as to why we should NOT provide support!
>>> > =A0Fortunately the problem is being eased by the replacement of the
>>> > legacy
>>> > =A0windows systems with Linux servers but that is still slow going in
>>> > some
>>> > =A0customer sites.
>>
>> There is zero difference, windows or linux does not matter at the
>> language level. If they don't want to migrate to 5.3, win or linux
>> does not matter.
>>
>> Anyway, that's off topic:)
>
> What makes you say that - has PHP5.3 suddenly started working with
> production releases of Apache on windows? Some site will not use third pa=
rty
> builds which is the WHOLE problem of PHP5.3 on windows ... only PHP5.2 is
> available to run with a stock install of Apache.

Lester,

We use apache and 5.3 smoothly and with the recent addition of rwlock
in apc on windows, it runs even better and faster.

I'm sorry but unless you provide bugs report with clear reproduce
where we can actually try to help you, there is no chance to get
anywhere with this kind of discussions.

Now I would suggest to use bugs.php.net to report any issue you have
on apache on windows with PHP.



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org