Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52998
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 93.190.64.35 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <4DEC7266.2000905@php.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 08:23:34 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A4930609E@il-ex2.zend.net>
In-Reply-To: <887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A4930609E@il-ex2.zend.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RE: Voting Process (was: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does
 not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward))
From: sebastian@php.net (Sebastian Bergmann)

Am 05.06.2011 22:05, schrieb Zeev Suraski:
> - There wasn't sufficient time, or nearly any time at all - between when Brian pulled it off the attic, and when a vote was called.  If my proposal is accepted, there'll have to be at least two weeks between when a clearly marked [RFC] email hits internals@, and when a vote is called.
> - There wasn't a clearly marked, separate [VOTE] email.
> - There wasn't a clear or easy way of voting.
> - No voting period was announced, instead, people were told to stop mess around and go vote.
> - The author of the RFC wasn't actively involved in the whole process (as far as I could tell);  There was no official replacement proposer.

 These are all valid points.

> I'd still like to hear from others what they think about my proposal.

 If your proposal addresses the issue mentioned above: +1. Haven't had
 the time yet to read through it again, sorry.

-- 
Sebastian Bergmann                    Co-Founder and Principal Consultant
http://sebastian-bergmann.de/                           http://thePHP.cc/