Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52981 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 6270 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2011 22:15:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2011 22:15:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.153 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.153 smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.153] ([67.192.241.153:35430] helo=smtp153.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 76/65-26000-D100CED4 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:15:58 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 1B9DA3002DD; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:15:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp15.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id AA02E3002D9; Sun, 5 Jun 2011 18:15:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DEC001A.8030800@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2011 15:15:54 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Felipe Pena CC: internals References: <4DEBDDE3.7060208@sugarcrm.com> <4DEBEC20.0@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] $arr = array('Hello', 'world'); $arr(); From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > 1. We do not use zend_fcall_info stuff in the VM (which zend_is_callable > works in) > 2. We have to use zend_do_fcall_common_helper instead of > zend_call_function() in the VM Yes, I know, I just have a feeling we have two pieces of code doing the same in different way. But I think your proposal is good, if we figure out later how to unify it we can do it. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227