Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52951 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 41225 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2011 18:40:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2011 18:40:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=olivier.hill@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=olivier.hill@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: olivier.hill@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.42 mail-pw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.42] ([209.85.160.42:36819] helo=mail-pw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D4/F8-26000-F7DCBED4 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 14:40:00 -0400 Received: by pwj3 with SMTP id 3so1856921pwj.29 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from :subject:date:to; bh=McbsrSlvdKvydKS7DnRgsSzX4reUVSjGPnrsoHE9ZM0=; b=mPlPMbHi6QI4Qj6PiY3/zhMqsyH0NpuO4NCxLEDjZDXDMxDBRYq66AC18Rjwo5eVrM 79NDEqOPKHM+T7iC6HFG0kXRGotBUATGRjk0YpBWbe4XtOHzXAcjfqQ60uCe7iAiPZKL WsBUx2pRW2b+DX3dTZdE2/rLuL5EuxPOaKPhE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; b=c0VKXL3FSMMmfNN5Nu0YFNugn7dEmzyLsCfN14q/38YOBAn79l/Ckd3hGj4ayBZJ9F 0/UULvvbDIQXuPxG9mkXsMwJjnxkwJJ74gTX4zxTNFdddARQpqq9DVgjMD37J9Am9u+W iqGcuMtxmdudI38/MifffQE1RHECrpS+jeXQk= Received: by 10.68.65.234 with SMTP id a10mr1486908pbt.300.1307299197223; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:39:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [198.134.94.61] ([198.134.94.61]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k9sm3095542pbc.38.2011.06.05.11.39.54 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:39:55 -0700 (PDT) References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net> <4DEB6A80.9030406@thelounge.net> In-Reply-To: <4DEB6A80.9030406@thelounge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-ID: Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148) Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 11:39:45 -0700 To: Reindl Harald Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions From: olivier.hill@gmail.com (Olivier Hill) Could you open a bug for GeoIP? Being aware of bugs helps more than bitching= around.=20 Thanks Olivier (iPhone) Le 2011-06-05 =C3=A0 04:37, Reindl Harald a =C3=A9c= rit : > Am 05.06.2011 12:57, schrieb Pierre Joye: >=20 >> The last point is that pecl allows a much more flexible release >> management than the core will even do.=20 >=20 > in theory >=20 >> So instead of doing some marketing/communication actions by bundling some= =20 >> known extensions, we should better promote pecl better.=20 >=20 > not promote - MAINTAIN it better! > in fact most of PECL-extensions are a lucky game since > linux distributors has to find workarounds for rarely > maintained extensions and you can not be sure that > a extension can be compiled after a update of php > or some system-library and only if you have luck > a maintainer answers on a bug-report > _____________________ >=20 > http://pecl.php.net/package/GDChart > dead, no longer maintained and it needed a message to this list to > get this confirmed by Ilia Alshanetsky, WTF - why is there no big > red hint "DO NOT USE IT" until now? >=20 > http://pecl.php.net/package/geoip - stable 2009-03-11 > what about try if this works after new releases of the > library behind - with recent GeoIP-Versions php crashs > if "geoip_db_get_all_info" is called, and sorry but > after more than 2 years it is not the users hob reporting > everything necause lazy maintainers writing code once > and orphaning it >=20 > http://pecl.php.net/package/pecl_http/2.0.0dev1 > coll, in th emiddle of 5.3 lifecycle a total incompatible > reqrite is started and hopefully no one has projects > relying on the pecl-extension >=20 > http://pecl.php.net/package/ssh2 > was three years not maintained and could not compiled > with recent versions of libssh2 without some magic > patches from distributors >=20 > http://pecl.php.net/package/gnupg > did not work for threee years on fedora-systems > no anwser on bu-reports - so what do you do in such a case? >=20 > and you will tell us PECL is a relieable source for components > anybody is using in his projetcs? not really! >=20 >=20