Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52939 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 91492 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2011 15:52:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2011 15:52:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=philip@roshambo.org; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=philip@roshambo.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain roshambo.org from 209.85.210.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: philip@roshambo.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.42 mail-pz0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.42] ([209.85.210.42:49259] helo=mail-pz0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 79/9F-26000-036ABED4 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:52:16 -0400 Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so1593948pzk.29 for ; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.52.40 with SMTP id q8mr1499491pbo.154.1307289133492; Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:52:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from c-24-19-164-241.hsd1.wa.comcast.net (c-24-19-164-241.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [24.19.164.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f3sm3017334pbj.32.2011.06.05.08.52.12 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 05 Jun 2011 08:52:12 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2011 08:52:11 -0700 Cc: Zeev Suraski , Stas Malyshev , Derick Rethans , PHP Internals Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: References: <4DE7F179.5010402@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89CD2.4040302@sugarcrm.com> <4DE9AA9B.3000108@sugarcrm.com> <5D5F48EF-F7CD-424B-B3C6-6FA1E1412FA0@roshambo.org> <887FE7CFF6F8DE4BB3A9535F53AFD06A493052EF@il-ex2.zend.net> To: Pierre Joye X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward) From: philip@roshambo.org (Philip Olson) On Jun 5, 2011, at 8:20 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > I'd to say that I'm very happy to finally see such discussions > happening, let sort the base (99% is done by our existing RFC about > release process, let adopt it already!) and move on with 5.4. This is a prime example of what we're talking about. Several have = expressed a desire to follow an Ubuntu style of branching instead of the = style proposed in said RFC. This is a core issue, so the RFC is = certainly not ready to adopt. So does this require a new RFC, or do the RFC proposers feel this is a = key concept? Regards, Philip