Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52910 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 69464 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2011 01:58:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2011 01:58:31 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=preinheimer@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=preinheimer@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.182 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: preinheimer@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.182 mail-px0-f182.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.182] ([209.85.212.182:61930] helo=mail-px0-f182.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DF/0D-14012-5C2EAED4 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:58:30 -0400 Received: by pxi20 with SMTP id 20so1901518pxi.13 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dLpp8lRfBpV51eKUek3PFSmJ5mmvF19iW1kViKXdvag=; b=h7DPoBEmc4Y0tjkiNg9DKD+U2nATKo2BorQXH+w8lvZZRTB5sQNrlGTbiCdIgGRLA+ IBdXKH+bb+b1vqpKVyn3jOCfb82qzA1qoSiO9imJeL+UHDkGG6GPPqQ2qG9U1RIkPyqm 0tb2a6+k6+b0UjzmcraKlugOViYWEytRxR46w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=MzzLtFfx7rkkcjelpdOMP/PdyUw1jCUIxSrvPlCISqHcc+Aqkrrg1k8Wc37SvB5H+k Y5QIJzBJUcyWmXbgi5l1dCiRfsk2aDcrhmyzQLzUGh5hh+kf6M4Y2yWE1NMZ8WoaQjZ/ wqezT5Ge1iUSu2VmRRunpWYH2kX5ZpdsrEoZs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.60.5 with SMTP id i5mr487164wfa.364.1307239106131; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.135.6 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 18:58:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net> References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net> Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 21:58:26 -0400 Message-ID: To: "internals@lists.php.net" Cc: Andi Gutmans Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions From: preinheimer@gmail.com (Paul Reinheimer) Hi All, > In parallel I'd also see if there are any key extensions which we think are mainstream, stable and well maintained enough to be included. For example, http comes to mind. With regards to the http extension, I've been using it in production for a while, but ran into an issue where it segfaulted and killed the worker when parsing incomplete headers (as returned by some servers) bug 19390 [1]. While this has been resolved in a more recent release, the thought of things segfaulting makes me nervous. Are there additional hoops for pecl extensions to jump through to 'prove' their stability before making it into the core? thanks paul [1] http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=19390