Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52906
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=db/NvuDdSKGSbYs91Y8rvVZW9cXh8lnuHgVmcVc6llq0GyDCmmC8TFXgsyEX8KMWcX
         QNQJ6v8bWLRJ152qH6t5Ms7maB5NbKvLFgO+NgeWsHWInvc4zuO4K065WzfRBqucQu1N
         QhiejjNdfxkCigQ1RNKtKg8h+RNd52xcHsLaU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DEAD511.2090408@lerdorf.com>
References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net>
 <4DEAC668.9050902@sugarcrm.com> <31B6F2D7-3E22-4A85-B391-70C4F06F7364@macvicar.net>
 <4DEAD511.2090408@lerdorf.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 22:13:56 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTim_LvOgqS01yhrLmVkVZ8bkx3ECXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rasmus <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Cc: Scott MacVicar <scott@macvicar.net>, "internals@lists.php.net" <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

Hi,

APC +1

I don't think it should have OAuth2 bundled (and I don't consider OAuth v1 =
too).

Related to thrift, I'm more in favor of having a native Cassandra
implementation than bundling thrift on PHP.
Thrift's implementation is not good (sorry Scott) and the overhead of
bootstrapping, connecting and running commands is very slow. I think
that before it becomes bundled it should be revisited and optimized.

Cheers,

On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Rasmus <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 06/04/2011 09:03 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote:
>> On Jun 4, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> In parallel I'd also see if there are any key extensions which we
>>>> think are mainstream, stable and well maintained enough to be
>>>> included. For example, http comes to mind.
>>>
>>> Maybe also oauth? It's getting popular and widely used.
>>
>> OAuth is basically outdated now, OAuth2 is going through the final IETF =
certification steps. No real technical changes in the last few drafts.
>
> And OAuth2 is simple enough that an extension really isn't needed for
> it. OAuth1 was painful and the extension helped a lot. But all the
> painful bits that the extension takes care of are gone in OAuth2.
>
> -Rasmus
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil