Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52904 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 57906 invoked from network); 5 Jun 2011 01:00:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 5 Jun 2011 01:00:19 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.213.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:45149] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CA/1B-14012-225DAED4 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 21:00:18 -0400 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so1363418ywh.29 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.131.18 with SMTP id e18mr2953795ybd.352.1307235607732; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:00:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.10.0.107] ([187.111.14.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b25sm2218874anb.46.2011.06.04.18.00.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 04 Jun 2011 18:00:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DEAD511.2090408@lerdorf.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:00:01 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott MacVicar CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net> <4DEAC668.9050902@sugarcrm.com> <31B6F2D7-3E22-4A85-B391-70C4F06F7364@macvicar.net> In-Reply-To: <31B6F2D7-3E22-4A85-B391-70C4F06F7364@macvicar.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus) On 06/04/2011 09:03 PM, Scott MacVicar wrote: > On Jun 4, 2011, at 4:57 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > >> Hi! >> >>> In parallel I'd also see if there are any key extensions which we >>> think are mainstream, stable and well maintained enough to be >>> included. For example, http comes to mind. >> >> Maybe also oauth? It's getting popular and widely used. > > OAuth is basically outdated now, OAuth2 is going through the final IETF certification steps. No real technical changes in the last few drafts. And OAuth2 is simple enough that an extension really isn't needed for it. OAuth1 was painful and the extension helped a lot. But all the painful bits that the extension takes care of are gone in OAuth2. -Rasmus