Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52899 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 43517 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2011 23:57:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jun 2011 23:57:38 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.113 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.113 smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.113] ([67.192.241.113:59354] helo=smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id DC/78-14012-E66CAED4 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 19:57:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4E07BD037F; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:57:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id DDDBFD035F; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 19:57:29 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DEAC668.9050902@sugarcrm.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:57:28 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Gutmans CC: "internals@lists.php.net" References: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net> In-Reply-To: <8757232E56758B42B2EE4F9D2CA019C901499F97@US-EX2.zend.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Bundling "modern" extensions From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > In parallel I'd also see if there are any key extensions which we > think are mainstream, stable and well maintained enough to be > included. For example, http comes to mind. Maybe also oauth? It's getting popular and widely used. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227