Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52887 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 67968 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2011 15:09:59 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jun 2011 15:09:59 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=johncrenshaw@priacta.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=johncrenshaw@priacta.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain priacta.com designates 64.95.72.238 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: johncrenshaw@priacta.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 64.95.72.238 mx1.myoutlookonline.com Received: from [64.95.72.238] ([64.95.72.238:13268] helo=mx1.myoutlookonline.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 33/55-23330-5CA4AED4 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:09:58 -0400 Received: from st22.mx1.myoutlookonline.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EDC78CA09; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:09:55 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: by SpamTitan at mail.lan Received: from HUB013.mail.lan (unknown [10.110.2.1]) by mx1.myoutlookonline.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EE378C968; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:09:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MAILR001.mail.lan ([192.168.1.2]) by HUB013.mail.lan ([10.110.17.13]) with mapi; Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:08:59 -0400 To: Philip Olson , Pierre Joye CC: Stas Malyshev , Derick Rethans , PHP Internals Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 11:09:48 -0400 Thread-Topic: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward) Thread-Index: AcwiwWRmtip/D47WS82RITtYbld1fwABgGPw Message-ID: References: <4DE7F179.5010402@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89CD2.4040302@sugarcrm.com> <4DE9AA9B.3000108@sugarcrm.com> <5D5F48EF-F7CD-424B-B3C6-6FA1E1412FA0@roshambo.org> In-Reply-To: <5D5F48EF-F7CD-424B-B3C6-6FA1E1412FA0@roshambo.org> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward) From: johncrenshaw@priacta.com (John Crenshaw) Speaking generally, consensus is a dangerous and impossible standard. Few t= hings can cripple progress like waiting for consensus. Voting may be one go= od way to move things forward without deadlocking forever. I agree though t= hat without clear rules for how the process should work, voting is also cha= otic. (Who can call for a vote? How? When is it final? Who can vote? How do= they vote? How much is each vote worth? Is a simple majority or super majo= rity needed?) John Crenshaw Priacta, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: Philip Olson [mailto:philip@roshambo.org]=20 Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 9:30 AM To: Pierre Joye Cc: Stas Malyshev; Derick Rethans; PHP Internals Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-D= EV] 5.4 moving forward) On Jun 4, 2011, at 3:07 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 5:46 AM, Stas Malyshev wr= ote: >=20 >> [VOTE] is a good idea, let's make it [VOTE]. >>=20 >>> There is no plugin used for it yet, and that's my problem with it. >>=20 >> Well, votes aren't announced yet either :) I'll try to get it set up ASA= P >> and see how it works, before announcing the vote. It looks good in >> description at least. >=20 > Please keep them in the wiki as we planed to do. THere are plugins and > it is very easy to manage, allows per section voting etc. I'm hopeful people will continue to understand the RFC definition: - RFC: Request For Comments And while doing so, not revert to a vote (RFV?) simply because discussing a= topic can get messy. Voting has clear winners and losers with potential lo= ss for improvements. That and you must then worry about who can and cannot = vote (i.e., non-inclusive community). It's rare that we've required a forma= l vote, so I fear we will now implement voting at inappropriate times rathe= r than allow a consensus to be reached. Also, people should be given a reasonable opportunity to offer an alternati= ve RFC.=20 Regards, Philip --=20 PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php