Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52878 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 89768 invoked from network); 4 Jun 2011 03:46:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jun 2011 03:46:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.113 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.113 smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.113] ([67.192.241.113:40973] helo=smtp113.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id E2/23-08509-F9AA9ED4 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 23:46:40 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp21.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 87383240490; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:46:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp21.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 3808E24048C; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 23:46:36 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DE9AA9B.3000108@sugarcrm.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2011 20:46:35 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derick Rethans CC: PHP Internals References: <4DE7F179.5010402@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89CD2.4040302@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward) From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > That is subjective. And even with a threaded client, if there are 80+ > new messages then the call for vote is drowned out. *Requiring* There was never 80+ new messages on different topics on the list. There are 3-4 topics max, if you not count commit messages. Each of them can contain dozens of messages, but those can be easily grouped. > something like [VOTE] in the subject helps, as then you can set-up a [VOTE] is a good idea, let's make it [VOTE]. > There is no plugin used for it yet, and that's my problem with it. Well, votes aren't announced yet either :) I'll try to get it set up ASAP and see how it works, before announcing the vote. It looks good in description at least. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227