Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52846 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 56721 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2011 08:22:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jun 2011 08:22:40 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:56847] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 58/00-56226-FC998ED4 for ; Fri, 03 Jun 2011 04:22:39 -0400 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0D0B10DEFC; Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:22:36 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 09:22:36 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky To: Stas Malyshev cc: PHP Internals In-Reply-To: <4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com> Message-ID: References: <4DE7F179.5010402@sugarcrm.com> <4DE89534.5070206@sugarcrm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Voting does not belong on the wiki! (Was: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 moving forward) From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Fri, 3 Jun 2011, Stas Malyshev wrote: > > Voting on the wiki? Yuck. If you want participation, do it here on the > > mailinglist and store the record in the wiki. If all "votes" are showing > > Voting on ML is messy and means somebody needs to read every message on the > list and look for votes, however long, tedious and offtopic the discussion > gets. Voting with, well, voting application is clean, automatic and efficient. > I don't understand why we should use medium that is unfit for the purpose > instead of using applications specifically designed for doing what we try to > do. Yes, it's messy on ML. My points where: - a call to vote is easily drowned out on the ML with all the noise - editting votes on a wiki can too easily be manipulated (I could just change your votes, and there would be no trail). And IMO, those two things should be sorted out before we "decide" to do votes by editting some page on some wiki. Derick