Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52827 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76371 invoked from network); 3 Jun 2011 00:20:08 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 3 Jun 2011 00:20:08 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=felipensp@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=felipensp@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: felipensp@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.210.42 mail-pz0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.210.42] ([209.85.210.42:47349] helo=mail-pz0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id FC/66-38878-6B828ED4 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 20:20:07 -0400 Received: by pzk37 with SMTP id 37so676966pzk.29 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:20:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=HhtLQf7lmqUh1QGq4jmFaAXbkL0KvJAyWlOY7ULkbUU=; b=wH3KODFv4DLUdfxPujHfYsrYGEtFOJnJoci5nl+sNlZvIe0Cr9fnrETNA1/RX4V1DW fdy0G7K+K1bUZ3+K7nq+Jw4zijqI0fkuCWHLDpnpzjTiWI7hDJE+3I4rXw4Td5Sk+9DA qKDYXnA+iN+6GhuQl9UNj7vt2LXnrmnB5TWCE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=XxTnJaJWsBN6bmzO944KKn5L8hkHVcziV/Q9v9HAX6LkPSEE+ExTYiiwPmp6T8e7sv 9v9AoNIhxfELvZBcBjt4usFkXH6igWRem8S5u8x1pdSthj4sufp22VMPnF4t5fpgRPCs Sl6V1vRNuSFAiu9eNVi1hoL9YY/TGTFioulwQ= Received: by 10.142.147.19 with SMTP id u19mr229114wfd.119.1307060404385; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 17:20:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.246.21 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 17:19:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DE80C77.1010109@no-surprises.co.uk> References: <4DE80C77.1010109@no-surprises.co.uk> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 21:19:44 -0300 Message-ID: To: Michael Maclean Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3098e1a7bba04a4c3b711 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Zend Signal Handling From: felipensp@gmail.com (Felipe Pena) --000e0cd3098e1a7bba04a4c3b711 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi, 2011/6/2 Michael Maclean > On 02/06/11 18:20, Gustavo Lopes wrote: > >> Em Thu, 02 Jun 2011 18:10:50 +0100, Ilia Alshanetsky >> escreveu: >> >> Killing TSRMLS_FETCH is a noble goal, but let's keep it to once patch >>> at a time please ;-) And for the record I am all for killing >>> TSRMLS_FETCH. >>> >>> >> Is there any advantage in killing it as opposed to simply not use it? >> > > I think he meant just replacing it in this patch. > > Just to inform, with the patched applied in trunk we have 4 SIGSEGVs with ext/pcntl tests: pcntl_alarm() [ext/pcntl/tests/pcntl_alarm.phpt] pcntl_signal() [ext/pcntl/tests/pcntl_signal.phpt] pcnt_signal_dispatch() [ext/pcntl/tests/pcntl_signal_dispatch.phpt] Closures as a signal handler [ext/pcntl/tests/signal_closure_handler.phpt] And 1 test hanging: ext/pcntl/tests/002.phpt -- Regards, Felipe Pena --000e0cd3098e1a7bba04a4c3b711--