Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52791 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70286 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2011 16:04:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2011 16:04:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.42 mail-ww0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.42] ([74.125.82.42:63728] helo=mail-ww0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 16/42-56626-394B7ED4 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 12:04:36 -0400 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so4902987wwk.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qwNtDCs/+GoLWXYiFNDtv/bCEX4IfIn18T5EfJlla/0=; b=sYS5ZEozXLvkpeqL5ZFxoExWAPJnf/v9x+DEYn+zACHgjzWRz4EkQaxBSgywT8WZxI AioQyViPl5TiQLiZueUqW4F1EoPHoKhIL+v71WVMhQb6V2l2TVhrNt543Qf0uZV4mw8J KHEmOrckZ0ryNwZoq1goNSIqfWZPyUXZh41M8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Zd9qByWXbqtAF6m1z61fNPEdofqofla1vEJJQJ9mB1AJYT9tVsOIinVJK++tXKjivL 9joi2QPa7octKw+p3pz9Prz6JnGq0rwQV+vOO40H3fQTKs/yWlRV6p/E6Uakn/z1kiI4 sVUQO4RTrLHQ8Fy3X+sXq9aq9ffM2hg3RMq74= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.236.208 with SMTP id w58mr6130952weq.62.1307030672183; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.253.168 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 09:04:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 18:04:32 +0200 Message-ID: To: Ilia Alshanetsky Cc: PHP Developers Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Zend Signal Handling From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) hi Ilia, I would suggest to kill the TSRMLS_FETCH while being at it. They are horribly slow and a couple of them can be replaced by the TSRMLS_DC/CC, if I'm not mistaken. For the windows side, I do not have the time to do the equivalent, so if you commit the patch to trunk first so I can fix the build accordingly and then merge, that would be easier for me :). Cheers, On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Ilia Alshanetsky wrote: > Since we are on the topic of reviewing past RFCs for 5.4, can we take > another look at the Zend Signals RFC: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/zendsignals > > The patch is solid (have been using it in production for quite some > time) and improvement is quite helpful, especially when APC is being > used. Are there any reasons not to apply this to 5.4? > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org