Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52778
Return-Path: <tomas.creemers@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 45157 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2011 14:29:32 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2011 14:29:32 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tomas.creemers@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tomas.creemers@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tomas.creemers@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.42 mail-yi0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.218.42] ([209.85.218.42:64699] helo=mail-yi0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id EF/78-30161-B4E97ED4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 10:29:31 -0400
Received: by yie36 with SMTP id 36so255043yie.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=j1eQQO4l5TZK6fPxer1X66FvkJk4sPONH903J3vhKhI=;
        b=lBIS2n4GHSYA/5JCq3xTit2qNh161aI+foJ0zSxX5LPkCzz7F8eC211gBbn2ecXiGw
         6BjlQSH+3IrTAMRhxNEXMzEPhxkF2e6Rf9lnNxOdlAkPfBIR7TvWpkwyOQOLy3x94Ngl
         OlbgcaayeRqgO1jioZBUrt8cNxqqttUcmzqyU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=UvIooQWvbLfBbwPOLTEHCoSMppk1jvO9kL5Wg2TPUerBecPEY3fGEIfdPdgE3C7Zq1
         hiACjvw9Auji3ya/N8YMAsksqa6SDoAvf77NAyRlL/qs/RJeEAdeHY/YD6UkDNVWeNWp
         lStboFqFN6FN8otsV/+1H+Ov8EgfIU6yIM4SA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.236.145.230 with SMTP id p66mr994278yhj.12.1307024968922; Thu,
 02 Jun 2011 07:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.236.103.141 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 07:29:28 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 16:29:28 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=2zU-+0fqM7j6Mg0VJwp0YOtq8_A@mail.gmail.com>
To: internals@lists.php.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: Request for Comments: Release Process: version numbering
From: tomas.creemers@gmail.com (Tomas Creemers)

Hi all,


I've just read the Release Process RFC
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess) and have a suggestion
regarding this part of the version numbering scheme: "x.y.z to
x.y+1.z".

I believe "x.y.z to x.y+1.0" is much more clear and common and less of
a departure from the current numbering scheme. Then again, the current
notation in the RFC might just be a typo :-)


Best regards,

Tomas Creemers