Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52754 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 93740 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2011 11:03:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2011 11:03:44 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.54 mail-ww0-f54.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.54] ([74.125.82.54:41440] helo=mail-ww0-f54.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6C/A7-49351-F0E67ED4 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:03:44 -0400 Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so738997wwd.11 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:03:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ETE6Usn47tD35Oh4xbmYbEGwsOaufxAE6f57Y0wEas0=; b=Kxv5ar2kSxNCmGRcyqgEv3VN2f+5/gUiLVli2Ipc5lOZA0WThdLjSR7YBDFCMJ0IRU QkSWiCG2/YC3Rkbopoh/csY9hm8zR3yX/fJmwwvRvCiGPkBbVMVCadgMfnXw0Gk0YdWc FAn98+/Jgo9LU2JYd8b2tGmhWtP9NwiuVGsf8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=tDmv7BL6O9FUzvPhPqm6l8Ma1QBUI2Shthr3xkUguIXSQEYjFukAUa4JVgPZZYLFA0 MF0/ijuhK7pRzrPSrHqz8O6ViGDvZd+sDE9wAQ49yLxMNVbiPGZgVwXIWTakCT4761ey vMeNJAJgtxCnVW7ZfPFZsB+V28gpoAdrF4tOQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.32 with SMTP id q32mr5817881wep.77.1307012620866; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:03:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.253.168 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 04:03:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DE6BE66.3070007@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:03:40 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Lind Cc: Christopher Jones , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Final version, RFC release process From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Peter Lind wrote: > On 2 June 2011 12:40, Pierre Joye wrote: > > *snip* > >> >> No, it is the same that what we proposed. What we proposed is that >> every release is actually a LTS release. What Ubuntu uses works fine >> for distros given that it is a distro with an insane amount of totally >> unrelated projects they distribute, and alternative repositories exist >> for almost each of them. >> >> For a programming language, it is a totally different story. >> > > That makes more sense - you were, however, arguing against random LTS > releases which was rather confusing (there's a big difference between > "every release is an LTS" and "all LTS releases are random" - those > are not the only options). The randomness is about which release-features tuples would become a LTS, that's something that can't apply well to a project like php. Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org