Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52753
Return-Path: <peter.e.lind@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 92379 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2011 11:01:46 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2011 11:01:46 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=peter.e.lind@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=peter.e.lind@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.218.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: peter.e.lind@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.218.42 mail-yi0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.218.42] ([209.85.218.42:57238] helo=mail-yi0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E0/67-49351-99D67ED4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 07:01:45 -0400
Received: by yie36 with SMTP id 36so169440yie.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=kW++5wA+UjCsOXTAZC5Ny9HyEQpHPpjWs9xTxZZfrEo=;
        b=wbZw0zCawHswpaW/3hlMhNeejcgby6Z/958FPwOyMMruQz5ef5QPQD9EIBnbaN89nq
         e+qcZ6LYkMqQFMh3aylP6iC78l+dOFvICJJu6xcxUXLnxxILM3MsZkpHGYtRC4wLmORO
         ogPesYHR55x+TK2l3s76YVXVFICWT+mp7R5HA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=Iga4eHCjRsrTCUNVQzLK8TI95QKm4RyCRi8gkPlwJkp8a/hpyAoFC/dp2/BToNPZM9
         N1qTCMHSY6X6/Qlxu45uj4TbeG5wt9rwMudXEsvImyayCHuO1DwN2Q2csVYYNFdDd3bQ
         EnvZwiFgvuxj5QyiUO06/sdZ1PqBpbAQFDVU4=
Received: by 10.90.57.26 with SMTP id f26mr568071aga.54.1307012503106; Thu, 02
 Jun 2011 04:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.90.33.19 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 04:01:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimsbDQ_dvom0BH_7UFVraf7ygS1EQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTim2Tbw+9egfrmrYfeZfNNwYWcg4dg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DE6BE66.3070007@oracle.com> <BANLkTinAaFn=-UY2AXFhKZQ6fqqWZz92AQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTim5n6ekS++GX2r9VKV-tf7221oC_w@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinzrcHTB7yXdcrKG-9U6J_9xMw52Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTimrNwFO7=svkN=L3qon45fUyLnLzg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimsbDQ_dvom0BH_7UFVraf7ygS1EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 13:01:23 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTinnAJ5f9Up5_ZW_6tci62wnOV8Fag@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com>
Cc: Christopher Jones <christopher.jones@oracle.com>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Final version, RFC release process
From: peter.e.lind@gmail.com (Peter Lind)

On 2 June 2011 12:40, Pierre Joye <pierre.php@gmail.com> wrote:

*snip*

>
> No, it is the same that what we proposed. What we proposed is that
> every release is actually a LTS release. What Ubuntu uses works fine
> for distros given that it is a distro with an insane amount of totally
> unrelated projects they distribute, and alternative repositories exist
> for almost each of them.
>
> For a programming language, it is a totally different story.
>

That makes more sense - you were, however, arguing against random LTS
releases which was rather confusing (there's a big difference between
"every release is an LTS" and "all LTS releases are random" - those
are not the only options).

Regards
Peter

-- 
<hype>
WWW: plphp.dk / plind.dk
LinkedIn: plind
BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51
Twitter: kafe15
</hype>