Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52739 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 53218 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2011 08:23:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 2 Jun 2011 08:23:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.42 mail-ww0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.42] ([74.125.82.42:49797] helo=mail-ww0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F3/A0-49351-68847ED4 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 04:23:35 -0400 Received: by wwk4 with SMTP id 4so4498055wwk.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:23:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mqoMDsU+vudkGQpr3hcWEWcGEUdNKfooX32TItiqHi4=; b=cHzbjTuQzjnavUx8XRufG8FvdluXhj25nOr+apfpqaj4M79vXh13/LGgyPa+46zsuw Ts3Z2kUly/0g9S92SaXFw1aWfFjSDUHPZfaI14758JhlTvB+hq+vYqHS5tQSsip8WJ6o Sb5cLdoRzDe5uEcetREk8WtvjpzjJ2UwOxzGQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=h4aGG9rfqQDu4bTtns8N3o3qnZy302yxrmWzDuW8mubORGaMlE+P76L5hViv8CZysC RbopVkr9d2HX9YoQA71aGDBlmtbVpoAEPftnzq/d8XfbuS+yadEVK+o/x19B0oX/5p01 nnfOwJGzArcUp/I5dAqUh+o7q7WBsOCFKLZzI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.136 with SMTP id r8mr2265863wed.0.1307003011307; Thu, 02 Jun 2011 01:23:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.253.168 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jun 2011 01:23:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DE6BE66.3070007@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2011 10:23:31 +0200 Message-ID: To: Peter Lind Cc: Christopher Jones , PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Final version, RFC release process From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Peter Lind wrote: > Sorry for jumping into the thread, but I couldn't help noting that you seem > confused about the distro suggestion. I think Ubuntu was the example, and > there's nothing random at all about their release process. There are fixed > timelines and life cycles in Ubuntu - having less branches does not in any > way stop them from having a fixed release process and schedule. It is about "random" release being chosen as LTS. For many users, it will preventing migration until a given feature is part of a LTS release. Our proposal to have fixed life time and release cycles does not have this random effect and each x.y release is equally supported for the same duration. The amount of branches can be reduced easily and even if we may have many at one point, it will be only about sec fixes, that's really not a problem (a bit of automated tasked will help here too). Cheers, -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org