Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52691
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=WD6HaFU1Bl7kyu7hVG7XGi1tPqAKEUXBxbCV8KrtkRUPPl/TdeqSDPK75U6MtJDP73
         IFzFvy28w5s2Oj+BaeD0aNpQWPk9fi8hGZpwZ+n33GhryY6KYqeOFLtYl88vPZofNq8v
         O1xdd3RtaDzEFusghjbeM6Z6wkjACywA3JOA4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DE5368A.6050603@moonspot.net>
References: <4DE5368A.6050603@moonspot.net>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 19:19:13 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikKe8qWfjkEnANo9p5=8s=JdcHujw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brian Moon <brian@moonspot.net>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] RFC: Short syntax for Arrays (redux)
From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye)

Reminder: Pls add your votes here:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortsyntaxforarrays/vote

On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Brian Moon <brian@moonspot.net> wrote:
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortsyntaxforarrays
>
> Since this was brought again recently by Rasmus
> (http://markmail.org/message/fx3brcm4ekh645se) and on Twitter where sever=
al
> people including Andi chimed in on it and Ilia seemed to reverse his
> thoughts as well (with caveats), I thought I would start a real thread ab=
out
> it. The reason the RFC stalled was stated as:
>
> "This patch will not be accepted because slight majority of the core
> developers voted against. Though if you take a accumulated mean between c=
ore
> developers and userland votes seems to show the opposite it would be
> irresponsible to submit a patch witch is not supported or maintained in t=
he
> long run."
>
> So, the PHP users want it, but too many PHP core devs did not want it or =
did
> not see the use of it. From rereading the mailing list archive, most had =
the
> tone of "I don't see a reason for it." I was in that camp in 2003 when it
> first came up. However, with the emergence of JSON and systems that use J=
SON
> as an interface, this type of syntax would be most welcome in the day to =
day
> life of a PHP developer.
>
> I would prefer (as Rasmus pointed out) not to start a long discussion abo=
ut
> it. Primarily I would be curious if anyone on the lists (from the RFC wik=
i
> page) below would like to change your vote or if you are not listed below
> and would like to be counted, that would be great too.
>
> PHP SVN account holder voters
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Pro: Andrei Zmievski, Andi Gutmans, Pierre Joye, Rasmus Lerdorf, Stanisla=
v
> Malyshev, Brian Moon, Kalle Sommer Nielsen, Edin Kadribasic
>
> Contra: Antony Dovgal, Derick Rethans, Jani Taskinen, Lokrain, Felipe Pen=
a,
> Lukas Kahwe Smith, Marcus Boerger, David Soria Parra, Johannes Schl=FCter=
,
> Maciek Sokolewicz, Philip Olson, Ilia Alshanetsky, Daniel Brown, Jochem
> Maas, Hannes Magnusson, David Coallier
>
>
> Other voters
> =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
> Pro: Sebastian Deutsch, Ryusuke Sekiyama, Stefan Marr, Alexey Zakhlestin,
> Carl P. Corliss, Darius Jahandarie, Giedrius D, Eric Coleman, Max Antonov=
,
> Mike Ford, Larry Garfield, Sam Barrow, Taylor Luk, Hans Ahlin, Karoly
> Negyesi, Guilherme Blanco, Jonathan-Bond Caron
>
> Contra: Geoffrey Sneddon, Tomi Kaistila, David Z=FChlke
>
>
> --
> Brian.
> http://brian.moonspot.net
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>



--=20
Pierre

@pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org