Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52677 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 20479 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2011 14:26:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2011 14:26:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=benjamin.dubois@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=benjamin.dubois@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: benjamin.dubois@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:50069] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CB/73-32367-50C46ED4 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 10:26:15 -0400 Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so4678574wyb.29 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:subject:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; bh=7jgFopeY2XGpdcL8b43/1xWfTN8luLHha5PetZ7+V1Q=; b=sbiFz4BSSTn9mc1RlzcNXfQN+GunLMXHiA2MCjILlEaeVxy7Tei7DmNYkHkrE8zwsv cKF2t9WMbCoylhTh+BmmbW7ZNVweJpTllwEnfNwRYoLbf/GRJrVjwDNCo5wBNSZjJ6dv Qcq4lQR8ZaY1nitVt3ruXA/2cvUL+rFB3+tlg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references:subject:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type; b=YzS71FkOL/Iv3aNeOxus6x3kcFTzMo+79KwcVkANSX21Pdr7WtY4Y1dPNIbJEdq+1D Scz65LyboGruzI7qPsfHfiwgym5lomK05fjqknp0TTH3T+B7zxHF5RFqDAElx4Qpmqia 2LB3qJNtxbjxU7Xbm0iBauzKpdkzL+hL3r2PY= Received: by 10.216.237.131 with SMTP id y3mr5239427weq.87.1306938369710; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:26:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MacBook-Pro-de-Benjamin-Dubois.local ([80.10.46.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id et5sm785726wbb.16.2011.06.01.07.26.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:26:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 16:26:03 +0200 To: Pierre Joye Cc: PHP internals Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: sparrow 1.2 (build 767.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="4de64bfb_180115be_4cd" Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Final version, RFC release process From: benjamin.dubois@gmail.com (Benjamin Dubois) --4de64bfb_180115be_4cd Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi,=20 =46rom a userland perspective, there should be absolutely no feature addi= tion in a =22bugfix=22 version (x.y.Z+1) : we would see (just like what w= e see today) frameworks, apps, or libraries depending on specific bugfix = releases, and this would not make php versioning easier to understand for= anybody.=20 And for you core devs, this is an open window for bypassing the standard = versioning process, which could result in long discussions or determining= if a feature is a self-containing one or not, and should be released in = a bugfix version. Allowing these exceptions would not IMO enhance the release process... Cheers --=20 Benjamin Dubois Le mercredi 1 juin 2011 =C3=A0 12:09, Pierre Joye a =C3=A9crit : > Hi, >=20 > Long due but finally sending the final R=46C for the release process. >=20 > There a couple of changes since the last time, they are all about > making it more transparent or catch the edge cases. We also got new > proposers on board, we are now basically almost all active devs on > board. >=20 > URL: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess >=20 > In parallel to the current discussions about 5.4's features, let get > this R=46C approved and use right away for 5.3 (to define its life time= ) > and 5.4. That will spare us the issues we had in the past with 5.3, > for example and ensure that we get 5.4 release in a reasonable > timeframe and without endless delays, or features additions. >=20 > It is important to keep in mind that this R=46C is not written in stone= > but it is a good base to begin with. We can always adapt it later, if > necessary. >=20 > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess/vote for the votes, pls add > your svn id. Proposers do not need to do it as they are indeed there > as +1 already (I added myself as example) >=20 > Cheers, > -- > Pierre >=20 > =40pierrejoye =7C http://blog.thepimp.net =7C http://www.libgd.org >=20 > --=20 > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php --4de64bfb_180115be_4cd--