Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52651 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 65864 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2011 11:15:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2011 11:15:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=pierre.php@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=pierre.php@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.82.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: pierre.php@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.82.170 mail-wy0-f170.google.com Received: from [74.125.82.170] ([74.125.82.170:61470] helo=mail-wy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id F9/B0-61684-B3F16ED4 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:15:08 -0400 Received: by wyb34 with SMTP id 34so4525337wyb.29 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:15:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Gtk50b9zyEfxlGRKtsfASoxQUr4TUEyZIoOFniKBTjc=; b=SemqRaAGr9ME8w6CiDbFglZFx554mHbh8OcjBbO3GEtIYri2tk0v7nrTBU6y9TZ0b8 Ml+bMWGdXW7UHwzniAYkC/DQ09xeGS0hkcWFsebB9NFfMVXbYtcjASSnANMuqNKSDJ/P 7YCxzNQgw3SNo5o9NWJ4hpWJDmUtrskGy6L3M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=YrBFnn6Og2cETRWplMrV3n3L8xGGCs9nnf67Elwtx4FZncCaJ28dZUgFjD8IwemYv9 nLsbKYAjUhz6W2s6nXl3EUHirESaAMc2KkxsIktqMLmEozSzPxa1fZAsU4px/eGo+/Mz uXO6K0njztvEaVBo2ZXwjPBRBIqpENu+yxOSg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.15.137 with SMTP id f9mr6901996wef.62.1306926905227; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 04:15:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.253.168 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 04:15:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DE61D77.7040506@zend.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:15:05 +0200 Message-ID: To: Dmitry Stogov Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Final version, RFC release process From: pierre.php@gmail.com (Pierre Joye) On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > hi, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Dmitry Stogov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> In my opinion a restriction "API compatibility must be kept (internals and >> userland)" for x.y.z to x.y+1.z is too strict. It just can block some new >> features forever. > > btw, new APIs do not break API or API. I mean API or ABI. > I do not think we should allow BC breaks between x.y and x.y+1. That's > counter productive and prevent users to migrate easily and quicker. > That's the whole point of having more frequent releases. We could allow BC break internally, using your wording, but that's something I do not like either. -- Pierre @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org