Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52649 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 62900 invoked from network); 1 Jun 2011 11:07:43 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Jun 2011 11:07:43 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dmitry@zend.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dmitry@zend.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain zend.com designates 212.199.177.89 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dmitry@zend.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 212.199.177.89 il-mr1.zend.com Received: from [212.199.177.89] ([212.199.177.89:45698] helo=il-mr1.zend.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id BA/10-61684-C7D16ED4 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2011 07:07:41 -0400 Received: from il-gw1.zend.com (unknown [10.1.1.22]) by il-mr1.zend.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4947C606E0; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:06:35 +0300 (IDT) Received: from ws.home (10.1.10.31) by il-ex2.zend.net (10.1.1.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.255.0; Wed, 1 Jun 2011 14:07:25 +0300 Message-ID: <4DE61D77.7040506@zend.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:07:35 +0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pierre Joye CC: PHP internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.1.10.31] Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Final version, RFC release process From: dmitry@zend.com (Dmitry Stogov) Hi, In my opinion a restriction "API compatibility must be kept (internals and userland)" for x.y.z to x.y+1.z is too strict. It just can block some new features forever. I would suggest to change "API compatibility must be kept" to "API backward compatibility must be kept as much as possible". Thanks. Dmitry. On 06/01/2011 02:09 PM, Pierre Joye wrote: > Hi, > > Long due but finally sending the final RFC for the release process. > > There a couple of changes since the last time, they are all about > making it more transparent or catch the edge cases. We also got new > proposers on board, we are now basically almost all active devs on > board. > > URL: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess > > In parallel to the current discussions about 5.4's features, let get > this RFC approved and use right away for 5.3 (to define its life time) > and 5.4. That will spare us the issues we had in the past with 5.3, > for example and ensure that we get 5.4 release in a reasonable > timeframe and without endless delays, or features additions. > > It is important to keep in mind that this RFC is not written in stone > but it is a good base to begin with. We can always adapt it later, if > necessary. > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/releaseprocess/vote for the votes, pls add > your svn id. Proposers do not need to do it as they are indeed there > as +1 already (I added myself as example) > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org >