Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52466
Return-Path: <dukeofgaming@gmail.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 23883 invoked from network); 19 May 2011 17:52:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 May 2011 17:52:50 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dukeofgaming@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dukeofgaming@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dukeofgaming@gmail.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.42 mail-gw0-f42.google.com  
Received: from [74.125.83.42] ([74.125.83.42:55290] helo=mail-gw0-f42.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id E9/B8-04336-FE855DD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 May 2011 13:52:49 -0400
Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so1151319gwb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=iWaX2N4M8Y891OvZUMr66Yy+t3cT8hpoKfblGFcOFMY=;
        b=roMmE/1OGF6qMYvXjRinRWCRTxm1WgbKJXncwISKFmen1DIDNNwv9AN+S+nY2yj9Vr
         ykwS36MqVNrfUWhxuFxs3Lp8w1Bq4O/AneSyJ2FeaY1WqtjdBiJ7f1OaTdFNJnEWDNim
         zWZhsrfVtEDT4uPvNSd6mwrt8CwGO/UEBKWjs=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=Af7xsohOkm/oazcYndARMvE9kpH8gu+DCB056JBNgPI9nwTQGOcnjYsrmxs1tZUELE
         +rZjisYov6fmk6aVWBgBkr6LHEL1Ya70UHAY7ijylRGMXe349nieMukkEgoMfwZEXnGd
         Kbq5EWq/ilVYq09wCstStCs92bqz/srZ9P1xI=
Received: by 10.101.98.8 with SMTP id a8mr2027519anm.62.1305827565123; Thu, 19
 May 2011 10:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.101.187.2 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 10:52:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <E7196641-14A3-4235-8B09-38506E4B5400@roshambo.org>
References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <DB.C3.22673.B3373E94@pb1.pair.com>
 <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com>
 <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> <ECCFDCE9-C262-49AC-A0E7-B24A2199A117@roshambo.org>
 <49E47BF2.3090807@gmail.com> <9b3df6a50904140811o6d57a426gd320a822271e19f3@mail.gmail.com>
 <F1CC660D-2FAC-422B-8739-844E0D8F01D7@bitextender.com> <49E4CE2D.7010402@zend.com>
 <3B1B513E-2712-40C4-AC20-4A21EB039629@roshambo.org> <BANLkTin+C7vMC8NpcUZP3ZR3zrpUDR5nVQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <0D1369A8-0154-4E34-9069-27AB267AE06F@roshambo.org> <4DD464C2.4060407@lerdorf.com>
 <4DD47AEA.1080306@sugarcrm.com> <BANLkTimfdwhveeQ=u7ZmdSMTWHw+FCEsBg@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinJKFsDT1UdOEbb1wkJJOL1FzVa_Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimgn0cMinVL10FP+SgX+5m8dU6psA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTimhp1a577Tyj3Ys55tCsGTri_0PCA@mail.gmail.com> <4DD538B1.1070205@cubiclesoft.com>
 <BANLkTim5zC8UB6bxL=_j4Es8H4_2HT3hgw@mail.gmail.com> <E7196641-14A3-4235-8B09-38506E4B5400@roshambo.org>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 12:52:25 -0500
Message-ID: <BANLkTikvrJ+TPDk8EdS9Wk_i+EmNc8dRXQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>
Cc: Thomas Hruska <thruska@cubiclesoft.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636ed6ce32839a104a3a4ace2
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6?
From: dukeofgaming@gmail.com (dukeofgaming)

--001636ed6ce32839a104a3a4ace2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:

> >
> > @all
> >
> > Can we decide on decoupling <?= before going back to the general short
> tag
> > matter?
>
> It feels like decoupling <?= from short_open_tag will happen. And I've not
> seen objections or reasons for not doing it, so think we can safely assume
> that it's been decided.
>

Awesome

--001636ed6ce32839a104a3a4ace2--