Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52461 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 97251 invoked from network); 19 May 2011 15:36:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 19 May 2011 15:36:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=thruska@cubiclesoft.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=thruska@cubiclesoft.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain cubiclesoft.com designates 74.208.167.7 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: thruska@cubiclesoft.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.208.167.7 u15187375.onlinehome-server.com Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 Received: from [74.208.167.7] ([74.208.167.7:4771] helo=mail.cubiclesoft.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 87/24-04336-FD835DD4 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:36:01 -0400 Received: from [192.168.2.100] ([174.18.43.232]) by cubiclesoft.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 11:35:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4DD538B1.1070205@cubiclesoft.com> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:35:13 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: PHP Internals References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com> <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> <49E47BF2.3090807@gmail.com> <9b3df6a50904140811o6d57a426gd320a822271e19f3@mail.gmail.com> <49E4CE2D.7010402@zend.com> <3B1B513E-2712-40C4-AC20-4A21EB039629@roshambo.org> <0D1369A8-0154-4E34-9069-27AB267AE06F@roshambo.org> <4DD464C2.4060407@lerdorf.com> <4DD47AEA.1080306@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6? From: thruska@cubiclesoft.com (Thomas Hruska) On 5/19/2011 12:23 AM, Arvids Godjuks wrote: > It's essentially the same what I said - move it out of stort_tags and > make it "On" permanently. > > As I remember the decision to remove short_tags was made together with > register_globals, magic_quotes and other legacy stuff. I can be that I > remember wrongly, but really do people really use<% ? Would be **really** nice if '