Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52452
Return-Path: <philip@roshambo.org>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 67217 invoked from network); 18 May 2011 23:47:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 18 May 2011 23:47:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=philip@roshambo.org; sender-id=unknown
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=philip@roshambo.org; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain roshambo.org from 209.85.160.170 cause and error)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: philip@roshambo.org
X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com  
Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:59825] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 20/AE-27388-19A54DD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 May 2011 19:47:30 -0400
Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so840287gyb.29
        for <internals@lists.php.net>; Wed, 18 May 2011 16:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.150.68.34 with SMTP id q34mr1948569yba.248.1305762446473;
        Wed, 18 May 2011 16:47:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.20.10.2] ([166.205.9.56])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q29sm970583yba.2.2011.05.18.16.47.23
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Wed, 18 May 2011 16:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTin+C7vMC8NpcUZP3ZR3zrpUDR5nVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 17:47:14 -0600
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <0D1369A8-0154-4E34-9069-27AB267AE06F@roshambo.org>
References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com> <DB.C3.22673.B3373E94@pb1.pair.com> <2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com> <49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com> <ECCFDCE9-C262-49AC-A0E7-B24A2199A117@roshambo.org> <49E47BF2.3090807@gmail.com> <9b3df6a50904140811o6d57a426gd320a822271e19f3@mail.gmail.com> <F1CC660D-2FAC-422B-8739-844E0D8F01D7@bitextender.com> <49E4CE2D.7010402@zend.com> <3B1B513E-2712-40C4-AC20-4A21EB039629@roshambo.org> <BANLkTin+C7vMC8NpcUZP3ZR3zrpUDR5nVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <tyra3l@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6?
From: philip@roshambo.org (Philip Olson)

> apparently somebody else brought up the shortag(specifically the <?=3D =
tag) topic again, and I've noticed that you moved the rfc from declined =
to "In discussion" recently =
(https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags?do=3Drevisions), so I would like to =
know that are these rules still hold, or did something happened since =
this decision?
> I couldn't find the suggested clarification in the docs either (maybe =
looked at the wrong place)

The topic split into a few directions with "decoupling <?=3D from =
short_open_tag" being one of them. I moved it to "In discussion" because =
the decoupling idea gained traction although afair it wasn't discussed =
at length, but it's part of the 5.4 'to discuss' TODO[1].

Regards,
Philip

[1] https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54