Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52450
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=CdJshRLoBgpfXUDosPFcOzkA6DlX3H0fXOT/Q5j7PPnxOWaElfZoPD5uWDOSHS48jv
         a4Ouc+xeZ19XqhqtdI6eaTsVSvEXSWguu404Stce+zqpcaY9XhM+NgJM4MBThUxoNF+J
         mJJv4v6SKu6o5JPxHLQAy0UHWTlGQtKZFGuLM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3B1B513E-2712-40C4-AC20-4A21EB039629@roshambo.org>
References: <49E352FD.6070008@gmail.com>
	<DB.C3.22673.B3373E94@pb1.pair.com>
	<2dedb8a0904131124u57f2f32ei27083a289f7f18a4@mail.gmail.com>
	<49E39B3C.2020401@zend.com>
	<ECCFDCE9-C262-49AC-A0E7-B24A2199A117@roshambo.org>
	<49E47BF2.3090807@gmail.com>
	<9b3df6a50904140811o6d57a426gd320a822271e19f3@mail.gmail.com>
	<F1CC660D-2FAC-422B-8739-844E0D8F01D7@bitextender.com>
	<49E4CE2D.7010402@zend.com>
	<3B1B513E-2712-40C4-AC20-4A21EB039629@roshambo.org>
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 21:13:51 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTin+C7vMC8NpcUZP3ZR3zrpUDR5nVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org>
Cc: PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65b52f87f987204a391b054
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Re: Is it true that short_open_tag is deprecated in PHP 6?
From: tyra3l@gmail.com (Ferenc Kovacs)

--0016e65b52f87f987204a391b054
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Philip Olson <philip@roshambo.org> wrote:

> PLEASE, let the dead horse be!
>>>>
>>>
>> Apparently, this horse is not as dead as some would like it to be :)
>>
>
> The horse is not dead or if so then no proper burial service was given.
> People are still waiting for the invitations and wanting to hear the eulogy.
>
> So, instead I'll make the following assumptions and engrave them into this
> topics tombstone:
>
>  - short_open_tag is fully alive
>  - short_open_tag is PHP_INI_SYSTEM|PHP_INI_PERDIR
>  - all distributed php.ini files disable it (5.3+)
>  - the default will be enabled, forever, unless #5 is used
>  - --disable-short-tags will exist, forever
>  - no new alternative syntax will be implemented, ever
>
> That's the situation people should understand and since this horse is
> considered dead I will:
>
>  - update php.ini ini descriptions to reflect this
>  - update documentation to reflect this
>  - mark http://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags as declined
>  - point to the declined rfc when people suggest these alternatives
>
> All discussion is over unless a human knows the above synopsis is false,
> because CVS has spoken. RIP.
>
>
apparently somebody else brought up the shortag(specifically the <?= tag)
topic again, and I've noticed that you moved the rfc from declined to "In
discussion" recently (https://wiki.php.net/rfc/shortags?do=revisions), so I
would like to know that are these rules still hold, or did something
happened since this decision?
I couldn't find the suggested clarification in the docs either (maybe looked
at the wrong place)

Tyrael

--0016e65b52f87f987204a391b054--