Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52449 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 81938 invoked from network); 18 May 2011 18:33:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 May 2011 18:33:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dukeofgaming@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dukeofgaming@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dukeofgaming@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.42 mail-yw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.42] ([209.85.213.42:42899] helo=mail-yw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id EA/00-15670-C0114DD4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:33:49 -0400 Received: by ywh1 with SMTP id 1so735674ywh.29 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=A3lidgQ4zjMRqfI0iqWb8/YM4JRN0cAoXeyhb/l0btM=; b=ZG/A1xUTnyeG0hsmCzYwjogB7wS3zgsLBgYlQnmmlHhGAcOgmx9DB/k7SZy48JnBZa ywdyQ4bm7Bw/ViQzvlnxDlmBaMNf2LpN0JQnJGfSBb4TbQqWjG1+r6eyr0isiq+4lANK FE8sBBT+ZnpeUstL4rtCD/m6XcLQUMI1XxamM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Rjjf5I7rY9A74/LvYeo+U41qA/gSvbZtrkmzStO0x/u/T18UhMXmXcakxhHH/wzYJc fmKpyjSzdDVMxNKP12ezda8BgEfZtGcH2vWRnX74pLsBvDgGkmG8u9AOOMeC86KC4pij bXqBGslDiY5os/nyWbx7Ty4iBkhD9nWXA2n+U= Received: by 10.101.2.1 with SMTP id e1mr1369520ani.18.1305743626103; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.247.5 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 13:33:26 -0500 Message-ID: To: Ferenc Kovacs Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c594ff006d4d04a391218a Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding the echo short tag From: dukeofgaming@gmail.com (dukeofgaming) --001636c594ff006d4d04a391218a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Should this go in "Accepted" then?. Regards, David On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote: > On Wednesday, May 18, 2011, dukeofgaming wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I just wanted to ask what is the community's feeling on keeping the echo > > shortcut. I know short tags are kind of deprecated and I think it is the > > right call, however, I really really think the echo shortcut be > > kept regardless of plain short tags, which are kind of pointless. I've > read > > the RFC regarding this and I think the second + third option are the only > > sane ones. > > > > Regarding syntax, I do like > <%=$var or <% $var. I think another option could be a valid namespaced > XML > > notation (which is still shorter than ), but > > maybe this later has bigger implications that I'm too stupid right now to > > realize (for better or worse). > > > > I'm personally still using them since the benefit and enjoyment of > working > > them supersedes the worst case scenario, which is a global find & replace > of > > can, > > however this is a luxury that can be only had with custom development, > not > > open-source projects due to the obvious problems with portability given > that > > short_open_tags is now off by default. > > > > Best regards, > > > > David Vega > > > > I thought we alredy decided to keep the short echo. > > Tyrael > --001636c594ff006d4d04a391218a--