Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52448 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 76114 invoked from network); 18 May 2011 18:16:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 May 2011 18:16:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.42 mail-ew0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.42] ([209.85.215.42:34148] helo=mail-ew0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 8B/E6-32761-71D04DD4 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 14:16:56 -0400 Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so547099ewy.29 for ; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=u/ueHctfW3w05Mz68uvtSlvd99ycoEK7UIJVpoxXOCM=; b=FlcDq+NxEymDzJ8HMQ9t7VyjDPGKAX3ZFbJhpwUHkmuXgNwyeg46JCqnL+RR3dtN6Y M2nYcMkt4M1FN4cyBX6xekN47gEZWvvwvR8PbwUtqkuQPFlssZ3HHYhVeUqtCvgDF0am nNtl/oLauBHw910/vLqB+Cm8cjlgGHys31d0E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RrLEDmPobisRoJ/XtSQiB0CDAgbEZmiswLWkCL8OoIZ5uxSaKBG4DRV9HF+xPjTJDy CsERmwYM8rs8Bw6oHGfYx3hJF/137GSi14yn9OEABPiqO6R5cE2v7PrgzMSVXp94ENM0 K8H+GbCJznW7tbYKi/bzVZqmkmEASyzFr6kYg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.53.207 with SMTP id g55mr804512eec.148.1305742611657; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com Received: by 10.14.37.13 with HTTP; Wed, 18 May 2011 11:16:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 20:16:51 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: h3c3L1K_ue5m0M5HjJ7kJsIxNvQ Message-ID: To: dukeofgaming Cc: "internals@lists.php.net" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Regarding the echo short tag From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs) On Wednesday, May 18, 2011, dukeofgaming wrote: > Hi, > > I just wanted to ask what is the community's feeling on keeping the echo > shortcut. I know short tags are kind of deprecated and I think it is the > right call, however, I really really think the echo shortcut kept regardless of plain short tags, which are kind of pointless. I've re= ad > the RFC regarding this and I think the second + third option are the only > sane ones. > > Regarding syntax, I do like <%=3D$var or <% $var. I think =C2=A0another option could be a valid names= paced XML > notation (which is still shorter than ), but > maybe this later has bigger implications that I'm too stupid right now to > realize (for better or worse). > > I'm personally still using them since the benefit and enjoyment of workin= g > them supersedes the worst case scenario, which is a global find & replace= of > however this is a luxury that can be only had with custom development, no= t > open-source projects due to the obvious problems with portability given t= hat > short_open_tags is now off by default. > > Best regards, > > David Vega > I thought we alredy decided to keep the short echo. Tyrael