Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52332 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 39503 invoked from network); 11 May 2011 22:15:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 May 2011 22:15:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=guilhermeblanco@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.213.170 mail-yx0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.213.170] ([209.85.213.170:52193] helo=mail-yx0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 78/89-25254-E7A0BCD4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:15:26 -0400 Received: by yxi11 with SMTP id 11so408207yxi.29 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SpJ/RgjHabiRvykTsEKFeVoOHp4bzky+Z2QOgsNGO7s=; b=RdKEFVPT84SWOqC+sTa/TpRsh2mB6JCTR69XOPW8XGw79FZwjMAuypHwUjINTuIXnz jjtaVap5MVngPXZxr0xwG+IkXT2wUsN1JVlfAh4autid4c6coMP33lsn4zdL6QkmnktI z051iC8b4F76qABrdmZD5Xw5GqKqEzIHDuCyY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=mi0GM959xpGmmizJgG0/EonO0ZN9/pMjB4suIFMxY6Ytpqpt4oIhlD9RDrAEMMD8Iy SV9Uv+Il3DL1HjdCZbUOfMJjsDsrsuOhJEZeme/Q1qZLsokVDHavuX0oOilWXx9oZ7bs H2F39AbEhB4eGHIgN61oQ3aPoywSOsmjZq/6M= Received: by 10.236.185.163 with SMTP id u23mr11512372yhm.177.1305152123308; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:15:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.171.4 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:15:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com> <4DC82A36.8090604@lerdorf.com> <4DC83401.2090202@sugarcrm.com> <4DC8D122.3050507@lsces.co.uk> <4DC8F125.2010503@toolpark.com> <4DC947E3.8070606@toolpark.com> <4DC9B62C.2040009@toolpark.com> <4DCA2E26.5010202@toolpark.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 19:15:03 -0300 Message-ID: To: dukeofgaming Cc: Lars Schultz , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com") @duke: Exactly. The idea is to expose this support through Reflection API @Marcelo: It is listed that this support would be necessary. On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:06 PM, dukeofgaming wrot= e: > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:57 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> Hi duke, >> >> I moved it to rejected in pro of a new proposal. >> I briefly drafted it here: >> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations-in-docblock >> >> There's a lot of things to be officially defined, but basic idea is ther= e. >> I expect to have a chat with interested core devs to see what can be >> done in this subject and find some common sense. =3D) >> > > Ok, so the agreed direction now would be to have some initial support for > annotations in comments to achieve syntax and data uniformity, and after = its > necessity/utility is obvious to everybody then we can move to native > support?. Is this correct?. > BTW, I love the idea of using JSON as value. --=20 Guilherme Blanco Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480 MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil