Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52331 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 35709 invoked from network); 11 May 2011 22:07:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 May 2011 22:07:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=dukeofgaming@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=dukeofgaming@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: dukeofgaming@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.170 mail-gy0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.170] ([209.85.160.170:56301] helo=mail-gy0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D2/B8-25254-9980BCD4 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 18:07:21 -0400 Received: by gyb11 with SMTP id 11so401527gyb.29 for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vIB2wBxJpnAs26C7Vbx6hD5VhuxX2hpl6/uMiPBlDj8=; b=yFmBV0D600fYZNhi/R6IGb25wc6x4RDtofBYjxZiiGEkAxFcswL0SEfuZNgeZwbLrh iWP29NBw59ExElHXVnxy5YtVuvmMKQVV0LGts7nT4WU8OGd3QLI3xGkv2fQ2aTapK7/L dDWTCaABnZtJdwaSNrnfU9363H07uwGvQkLUQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=UaKUqjnUKkmJZMqvyFNmioXEIfA9a65YhkjVhemK5IsH5MIPeSeXrtAUMoJljU61Fk 5CY/YI6/kxVgb9ao7sZhjPRwegy+3dR5TEg83ElF+3k/slZRxaCNxW7skTex0fHoMGqA 6yta1YRG0XAVJM+bsf5En3HVXizw1Eex9NZXw= Received: by 10.101.63.10 with SMTP id q10mr368310ank.61.1305151636144; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:07:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.108.6 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2011 15:06:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com> <4DC82A36.8090604@lerdorf.com> <4DC83401.2090202@sugarcrm.com> <4DC8D122.3050507@lsces.co.uk> <4DC8F125.2010503@toolpark.com> <4DC947E3.8070606@toolpark.com> <4DC9B62C.2040009@toolpark.com> <4DCA2E26.5010202@toolpark.com> Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:06:56 -0500 Message-ID: To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" Cc: Lars Schultz , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636eee3dca682dc04a3074b3d Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again From: dukeofgaming@gmail.com (dukeofgaming) --001636eee3dca682dc04a3074b3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:57 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com < guilhermeblanco@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi duke, > > I moved it to rejected in pro of a new proposal. > I briefly drafted it here: > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations-in-docblock > > There's a lot of things to be officially defined, but basic idea is there. > I expect to have a chat with interested core devs to see what can be > done in this subject and find some common sense. =) > > Ok, so the agreed direction now would be to have some initial support for annotations in comments to achieve syntax and data uniformity, and after its necessity/utility is obvious to everybody then we can move to native support?. Is this correct?. BTW, I love the idea of using JSON as value. --001636eee3dca682dc04a3074b3d--