Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52258 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 70185 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 20:03:39 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 May 2011 20:03:39 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=chadfulton@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=chadfulton@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 74.125.83.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: chadfulton@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 74.125.83.42 mail-gw0-f42.google.com Received: from [74.125.83.42] ([74.125.83.42:44093] helo=mail-gw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id B4/E2-04851-A1A99CD4 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 16:03:38 -0400 Received: by gwb17 with SMTP id 17so2776830gwb.29 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:03:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DAKIFEgzGwaXAOYhR2ZYKqiY4PVnt2gE5EoizOXAOuY=; b=EGI8K/mlZva/TlIUyQQrvW7N4l1I66QEo3GyZhYFq6zL9Qae19X7ErglPhTld11AC0 87wHWiA6yzV2wPmANfBidaW9O0nYupYZ3Cze/xQMHM7YtYea8v4BpA/UXlTWP2CLyDvX AE7KCo4iOSyzrSL2ScV7WMuSHVD+G0pyZdIF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=tcmsb+kWO2tIIJhKrXEZ4b6NaN/ESyHa0SDUub2DOlCQ3A+Hipyt6DRrJ9BGFr9k1I OAC0HejBXRxUgAXwPQlMmK1yf2knf58l7g+bYwbzM4I71W3E8QkidusJLxwYpgxz5CiN g/qy4opmIpY/a/MrpdB71D04Hry98YAKVNhKA= Received: by 10.90.135.8 with SMTP id i8mr7026489agd.113.1305057815190; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:03:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.51.20 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:03:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com> <4DC82A36.8090604@lerdorf.com> <4DC83401.2090202@sugarcrm.com> <4DC8D122.3050507@lsces.co.uk> <4DC8F125.2010503@toolpark.com> <4DC8FB1A.7040206@lerdorf.com> <4DC98100.6080806@oracle.com> <4DC9827B.6080409@lsces.co.uk> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 13:03:15 -0700 Message-ID: To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" Cc: PHP internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again From: chadfulton@gmail.com (Chad Fulton) On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 12:35 PM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Based on an extensive chat with Matthew, I think we reached some consensus. > I'll write another RFC related to Annotations in docblocks, then we > can chat until reach some standardization and availability. > > I'll keep the old one for history purposes. It seems that none from > core php devs accepted it, so I'll move it to rejected. > As I told you previously, all I wanted was some good feedback to give > a north and that's what I had. > > As soon as I finish the new RFC, I'll open another thread here for > fine-grain the support and discuss architecture. > I'll keep Stas comments in mind when creating it, so it would help in > discussions. It seems we still have 2 weeks to discuss the new idea > and less than 2 months to get it ready if everyone agreed. Please first take a look at the current RFC regarding parsing docblocks: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/docblockparser . Even if you want to put up a competing RFC, at least you can use it as a point of reference. Chad