Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52250
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=YAY3h6S+EVCHx4pb9o54ERNMgYccCAxuB4iqQZaTMaXZ5Xaa7uScYMVeiu1zQ9Xgaf
         3tP9EUQK0ntGmM1t7wVfqXGOKExqo3uXSbDsfziexgN2c8wnA5XAeDVMqlKZ4slc/eTV
         j/0NDUvL9XRjI/4BSmPiLWkveVVcQ1YBPO8s4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikAhrUBe7mrCDXu-Q1+YqjggQTUrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BANLkTinO0h7020fs+PLjM0fUmMjQXoTsyw@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTim8p7A5+svvjZw6rc_KE+tBMnOsjw@mail.gmail.com> <4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com>
 <BANLkTikpLY+AntSrNi91rzGNZi4FkPrSwA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC82A36.8090604@lerdorf.com>
 <BANLkTi=aLVw8KqOV_jb9dBm=XqX6TqTVwA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC83401.2090202@sugarcrm.com>
 <BANLkTiniayhZ+8CRQjPFBDLOBu=E7UUv=A@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimvE1nE+UOv+8hUaPiyfozn3PgU3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinfEFsiSWOi3RgjZ4-6QeNjRVMwTQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DC8D122.3050507@lsces.co.uk>
 <BANLkTim1euVOKXxLc3FdhJAywqnPHDkbwg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=AxkZf_jMUJ0MaRREVX9t33Ex0Zw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DC8F125.2010503@toolpark.com> <BANLkTi=aUL0UNUK9tF9cz8Nsm3z8AB0XQQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DC8FB1A.7040206@lerdorf.com> <BANLkTin+jWCzDapesBPaYXXfbCeDDS=UtA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DC98100.6080806@oracle.com> <4DC9827B.6080409@lsces.co.uk> <BANLkTikAhrUBe7mrCDXu-Q1+YqjggQTUrw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 16:35:39 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTinVJ6s41yeWgtd53bJkOFW1mMcfPw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ferenc Kovacs <info@tyrael.hu>
Cc: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

Hi all,

Based on an extensive chat with Matthew, I think we reached some consensus.
I'll write another RFC related to Annotations in docblocks, then we
can chat until reach some standardization and availability.

I'll keep the old one for history purposes. It seems that none from
core php devs accepted it, so I'll move it to rejected.
As I told you previously, all I wanted was some good feedback to give
a north and that's what I had.

As soon as I finish the new RFC, I'll open another thread here for
fine-grain the support and discuss architecture.
I'll keep Stas comments in mind when creating it, so it would help in
discussions. It seems we still have 2 weeks to discuss the new idea
and less than 2 months to get it ready if everyone agreed.

Regards,

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Ferenc Kovacs <info@tyrael.hu> wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:22 PM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Christopher Jones wrote:
>>
>>> The editor argument is out of place do you really think that the
>>>> engine should we built around what IDE supports?
>>>>
>>>
>>> IDEs are part of the PHP ecosystem, just as much as frameworks, op
>>> code caches, documentation, bug reports, maintenance issues and even
>>> current technology trends. =C2=A0The benefits of a new feature must be
>>> calculated taking into account its impact on the whole ecosystem.
>>>
>>
>> And many of us do not recognise some of the 'complaints' simply because =
our
>> own ecosystems have already solved the problem, but it's these 'new
>> developments' that are threatening to destroy a perfectly stable system.
>>
>>
> sorry my FUD counter just overflowed with your last comment.
>
> Tyrael
>



--=20
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil