Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52243 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 36520 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 18:28:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 May 2011 18:28:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ey0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:42320] helo=mail-ey0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 67/4C-04851-2B389CD4 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 14:28:04 -0400 Received: by eyf5 with SMTP id 5so1939793eyf.29 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uQEkt2L1qBLCchS4tVm/J5gDnEziwbopCillbyzF1sA=; b=RTyPSzLDoZjJm+hYElJbrNsj9c5JjUiuPnmxCrPMCZqQ6Q5NXj/PyHjbN4HeoGm7NF Ssa1IvbTu3c+I/jNFm+F1orasExo5D64uJS8s50rV89KGk8ZTluwuOLa7xZhAZDx4MBF 0CM0cSWMBqM59ACtxSkfRqnT4RYgr67vV/XKg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=Sy3GZjoXPSjHskpQ1G9e+1o3FmgLZEpX8ufz8DAj6vCVtj+FUOQueSkt8B1XoGg7g6 XUW5YWIF6tEm8FLXK3L/BnuudhXWs9L9yjqbVh28Rpdn1yhAcft+Wuw105A4U91pgrpv A7J6+Iqfou4kgipocuGMPDeIk5eWy4ZGdN0ig= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.148.67 with SMTP id u43mr3863358eej.7.1305052079503; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com Received: by 10.14.127.7 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 11:27:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <000001cc0f3e$f61c2390$e2546ab0$@ca> References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> <4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com> <3680807C-229A-4889-9181-8953303425EC@stefan-marr.de> <4DC9081C.3020808@php.net> <17.15.04851.C5069CD4@pb1.pair.com> <000001cc0f3e$f61c2390$e2546ab0$@ca> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:27:59 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZgZfYFzHIbFJJ0wpCCo0Qnxpz_Q Message-ID: To: mike@rile.ca Cc: "Matthew Weier O'Phinney" , internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a7af89cba6304a2f01d01 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs) --bcaec51a7af89cba6304a2f01d01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Mike Robinson wrote: > May-10-11 11:57 AM Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > > A native docblock annotation parser would much better suit our > > purposes. > > +1, FWIW. > > extending the Reflection::getDocComment to support retrieving the docblock comment as an array of key => value pairs wouldn't be too hard to implement. I find it funny that you, Sebastian and others who are supporting docblocks over annotations didn't found the time to do it, but you always bring this up. Tyrael --bcaec51a7af89cba6304a2f01d01--