Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52206 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 25553 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 09:39:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 10 May 2011 09:39:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=tyra3l@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=tyra3l@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.215.170 mail-ey0-f170.google.com Received: from [209.85.215.170] ([209.85.215.170:61011] helo=mail-ey0-f170.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id D5/22-13354-AE709CD4 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 05:39:54 -0400 Received: by eyf5 with SMTP id 5so1795020eyf.29 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 02:39:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=mAusf2xw6Wb8PbpM6yRIsOPqTv7RCod2QR51Up5BNS8=; b=mWqvjpqhCyV/Y79C0Y5GcZeiScFKuJ63HP4da7OB/9e7RO18asR2RxnL3ObUJh1+ou 3G4ozZLxnDVseQTg1/9n+nyaR0gL/JlZs9PyikUcig2tarn8Vf165oWyrkLATfmGxt/M ERAcjJUBZ3RDRPOLLr0T8gvuQkf4ormo/8qTU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=APPQKK1RC4kUA2+zFhBLaVfyWpkvXGcTBHd0eZbmxUJqfQJhl4sbaSiiGJjNxzw8JH 29CQHuW/krhzCjUVmUVOhwAwZJusnVqfNSbfB2ePxYGuv74MSvHc0G5sIlf5l9K2h9W7 C+ik2aqVFGwzWNF3FCU0hfO7hwYxsvsiCBCfE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.16.102 with SMTP id g78mr3055518eeg.135.1305020391111; Tue, 10 May 2011 02:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com Received: by 10.14.127.79 with HTTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 02:39:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DC906CB.2030503@php.net> References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> <4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com> <4DC906CB.2030503@php.net> Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 11:39:51 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NzP1VF12dqSYEnej3I3p7Rc5b2k Message-ID: To: Sebastian Bergmann Cc: internals@lists.php.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e657b16ad63bd304a2e8bc6e Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs) --0016e657b16ad63bd304a2e8bc6e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Sebastian Bergmann wrote: > Am 09.05.2011 18:55, schrieb Marcelo Gornstein: > > regarding the annotations stuff: it seems the php community (in > > general) really wants annotations. lots of important and widely used > > frameworks use them (meaning that not only the plain php users have a > > use for this feature, but also the users of the respective frameworks, > > increasing the overall user number interested). i.e: doctrine, > > symfony2, ding, phpunit, etc, etc. we cant just ignore this fact. > > I see no problem with the way that PHPUnit handles its annotations at > the moment. I do, however, see problems with a migration of PHPUnit to > an annotation system provided by PHP: whatever its syntax, if I wanted > to use it in PHPUnit that means that existing tests will have to be > changed. > > why would you migrate if you are fine with your current setup? Tyrael --0016e657b16ad63bd304a2e8bc6e--