Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52190
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=UAZl0Kqw86avP1QPNTUUu+VjQ6iawnsF1+lzaz3nJCgxhzmWlVTbewbYKqRVvVDj97
         kErlpN7KEh14QKAzmglTTer7bovbnsHA8LWkeuHbVFs/iM4CwqV9HjTo/68S7xWctvBS
         eju4p3XjBCZAdnNK5aNOawUzngRZb+89WaSrM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4DC88602.30400@lsces.co.uk>
References: <BANLkTinO0h7020fs+PLjM0fUmMjQXoTsyw@mail.gmail.com>
	<BANLkTim8p7A5+svvjZw6rc_KE+tBMnOsjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com>
	<BANLkTikpLY+AntSrNi91rzGNZi4FkPrSwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC82A36.8090604@lerdorf.com>
	<BANLkTi=aLVw8KqOV_jb9dBm=XqX6TqTVwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC85FBE.2060005@lsces.co.uk>
	<BANLkTikH4H140xh8YLL_J+3dUS6UQAozhw@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC88602.30400@lsces.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 02:36:17 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=SUg8y1KxPmgfjwvgc6SkeM+BSew@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>
Cc: PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e1ec5be507c404a2e1241f
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Please let's not bitch about lazy users not learning C
 to implement THEIR missing feature. (Was Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again)
From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs)

--001636e1ec5be507c404a2e1241f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 2:25 AM, Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk> wrote:

> guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Lester,
>>
>> I updated the RFC. I may have missed one thing or two, but overall
>> idea and how code behave is there.
>> This question is answered on wiki RFC. =)
>>
>> Here is the direct link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations
>>
> But there is nothing there that explains why this is any use where we are
> not compiling code ... and are all things we are already doing with comment
> blocks ... which CAN be stripped to speed up operation once in a production
> environment. A compiler simply strips the unnecessary stuff when building
> the running code, how do you propose PHP does that ? If I want compiled code
> then I can use any number of other languages, PHP simply runs what I have in
> the file.
>
>
what do you miss? the general introduction of the annotations or the
implementation specific details of the proposed rfc?
obviously the parser doesn't strip the annotations, because the annotation
isn't comment.
this is why it isn't interchangeble with the docblock that you mention.
if you don't need that kind of information, then you shouldn't use
annotation in your code.
and ffs stop trolling, I tried to ignore your arrogant emails on this topic,
but I couldn't.
please read back the last couple of your message, maybe not I'm the only one
who is offended by your tone.
thanks.

Tyrael

--001636e1ec5be507c404a2e1241f--