Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52188
Return-Path: <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 51128 invoked from network); 10 May 2011 00:35:45 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 10 May 2011 00:35:45 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.203 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com
X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.203 smtp203.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6
Received: from [207.97.245.203] ([207.97.245.203:54110] helo=smtp203.iad.emailsrvr.com)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id 28/D5-14908-F5888CD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Mon, 09 May 2011 20:35:44 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp50.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 796EE370613;
	Mon,  9 May 2011 20:35:41 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: OK
Received: by smtp50.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 0177D3702C7;
	Mon,  9 May 2011 20:35:40 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4DC8885C.9090608@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 17:35:40 -0700
Organization: SugarCRM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
CC: Lester Caine <lester@lsces.co.uk>, 
 PHP internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <BANLkTinO0h7020fs+PLjM0fUmMjQXoTsyw@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTim8p7A5+svvjZw6rc_KE+tBMnOsjw@mail.gmail.com> <4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com> <BANLkTikpLY+AntSrNi91rzGNZi4FkPrSwA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC82A36.8090604@lerdorf.com> <BANLkTi=aLVw8KqOV_jb9dBm=XqX6TqTVwA@mail.gmail.com> <4DC85FBE.2060005@lsces.co.uk> <BANLkTikH4H140xh8YLL_J+3dUS6UQAozhw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikH4H140xh8YLL_J+3dUS6UQAozhw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Please let's not bitch about lazy users not learning
 C to implement THEIR missing feature. (Was Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again)
From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev)

Hi!

> I updated the RFC. I may have missed one thing or two, but overall
> idea and how code behave is there.
> This question is answered on wiki RFC. =)
>
> Here is the direct link: https://wiki.php.net/rfc/annotations

Some questions I didn't find the answers in the RFC:
1. When the annotation objects are instantiated?
2. What is permissible in the arguments of annotation - e.g. can I put 
any expression there?
3. What <Foo(<Bar>)> actually means and how it is supposed to be parsed?
4. What happens if ctor for annotation has error/exception?
5. Are there any limitations on classes that can be used as annotations?
6. Do we need any special support for bytecode caches?

-- 
Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
(408)454-6900 ext. 227