Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52183 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 28317 invoked from network); 9 May 2011 22:09:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2011 22:09:53 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=ilia@prohost.org; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=ilia@prohost.org; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain prohost.org designates 209.85.214.42 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: ilia@prohost.org X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.214.42 mail-bw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.214.42] ([209.85.214.42:63009] helo=mail-bw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id A9/22-14908-F2668CD4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 18:09:52 -0400 Received: by bwz18 with SMTP id 18so5082942bwz.29 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 15:09:48 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.139.199 with SMTP id f7mr754084bku.23.1304978988223; Mon, 09 May 2011 15:09:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.72.3 with HTTP; Mon, 9 May 2011 15:09:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:09:48 -0400 Message-ID: To: Stas Malyshev Cc: PHP Internals Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again From: ilia@prohost.org (Ilia Alshanetsky) Seems like a good plan to me. Hopefully as per schedule it gets us 5.4 this year. On Sun, May 8, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > I has been almost a month since we did our routine talk about 5.4, so here > it goes again. The patch for the scalar hints seems to be pretty simple (see > http://random-bits-of.info/no_scalar_hints.diff - no generated files > included, that will be done on actual commit), so it should not hold us too > much. > I propose putting current code in a branch and continue without scalar > typing for 5.4 - any objections to that? > > I would like to propose the following process (of course, dates can be moved > around, etc. - I consider phase lengths be more important that actual dates, > but any of them can be shifted if reason arises) for 5.4: > > - starting now - nominate features for 5.4 (see > https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54), discussion on them > - May 18 - start voting and debating on features that have no clear > consensus support immediately. On the end of May is also phptek, so we could > have some discussion there about it if needed. > - June 15 (a bit more than a month) - alpha, branching of 5_4, open only for > bugfixes and features in TODO list that are approved and can be done by beta > time. > - July 20 - beta, bugfixes only (if we add a lot of features, we may want to > insert another 1-month alpha period, so far it doesn't look like it but may > change) > - Aug 24 - RC1, then an RC every 2 weeks until stable > - Release - somewhere in October or November, depending on the RCs. > > I think we need to start moving. Not much is happening in 5.4 now as far as > I can see, and we have a good feature set that is long due to be released. > For proposing stuff for 5.4, please do it here: > https://wiki.php.net/todo/php54 and also on the list if it wasn't discussed > and you think it requires discussion. > > -- > Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect > SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ > (408)454-6900 ext. 227 > > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >