Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52167 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 83654 invoked from network); 9 May 2011 17:39:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2011 17:39:06 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=rasmus@lerdorf.com; spf=permerror; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=rasmus@lerdorf.com; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.160.42 cause and error) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: rasmus@lerdorf.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.160.42 mail-pw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.160.42] ([209.85.160.42:53983] helo=mail-pw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id CE/AD-20726-7B628CD4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:39:05 -0400 Received: by pwj3 with SMTP id 3so2785753pwj.29 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 10:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.34.70 with SMTP id x6mr1838488pbi.344.1304962741165; Mon, 09 May 2011 10:39:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.200.140] (c-76-126-236-132.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [76.126.236.132]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f4sm4235128pbd.13.2011.05.09.10.38.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 09 May 2011 10:38:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4DC826B1.4090806@lerdorf.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 10:38:57 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" CC: PHP Internals References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Please let's not bitch about lazy users not learning C to implement THEIR missing feature. (Was Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again) From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf) On 05/09/2011 10:32 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Again what I commented on other thread and again you barely see what I > mentioned, the feature is ALREADY written in C and compatible with > latest PHP trunk. > I'm not bitching against do and don't dos... I'm bitching about > ignored feature that are not even discussed. > > I agree with you, it's an Open Source project and any help from any > front is valuable. > But as I pointed out on other thread, only developers with php-src > karma had features evaluated. > If you think I'm wrong, please re-read the entire thread of > Annotations and then get back to me with a single message on thread > where actually had a discussion with some mature content instead of > personal feelings. A lot of people who understand the problem very well weighed in on this feature. Framework authors and others who have a real use for annotations, and there was still no clear agreement. As far as RFCs on the wiki only coming from people with php-src accounts, that is true, since that is our auth system for the wiki. But getting an account, even if it is simply to submit an RFC to the wiki is rather trivial. Or looking at it another way, if the feature is so popular, getting one of the 2000 people with an account to submit the RFC shouldn't be a problem. -Rasmus