Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52164 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 79607 invoked from network); 9 May 2011 17:30:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2011 17:30:54 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 207.97.245.183 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 207.97.245.183 smtp183.iad.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [207.97.245.183] ([207.97.245.183:60387] helo=smtp183.iad.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 12/DC-20726-DC428CD4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:30:54 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp38.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 981EB348A02; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:30:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp38.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 22D2F3489FD; Mon, 9 May 2011 13:30:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DC824C9.2060909@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 10:30:49 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" CC: PHP Internals References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > - ReflectionNamespace > - Annotations > - SplArray > - Comparable Thanks for the list, it's a good start of the discussion. I have only one note for now - since the goal of all this to try and get 5.4 out before the end of the year, I think that requires some scope limiting. By this I mean that if something is proposed to which the implementation or design isn't obvious, there should be commitment for it to be done in next 2 months. By "done" I mean both having design with reasonable consensus and full implementation. So if somebody proposes something entirely new that the implementation is not obvious or already existing, he should either make commitment to do this in the next 2 months personally or find somebody who will. Of course, 2 months here doesn't mean exactly 61 days, but it's the timeframe. I.e., if it's an idea "let's somebody do it" - it might be a perfectly good idea, but not for this 5.4. That doesn't mean it's rejected - it just would be out of scope for this release. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227