Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52162
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.213.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=wc04/yerkrcQ1BfBOvK27sBvOd7L+BYNhA3WtG1yAzxPmTp5QpJlRgxhkpR5ru97KA
         3oavwd2l2DWGbLlz6JyfLxmeE0/6jZMWv/PPsE4wHPkJ6MMoJ7fRqhvswa9El+hDj8qw
         WQ1UmS9anCU/UZYScRvfMl626LLMUhcZ9EM40=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com>
References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com>
 <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> <BANLkTinn3+MCrSd7BAJCU03FMkuRAeydvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:25:51 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTimn9teRbkAYxGcGCz9djDsvPY+WfQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
From: guilhermeblanco@gmail.com ("guilhermeblanco@gmail.com")

Hi Rasmus,

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
> On 05/09/2011 07:44 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> - Annotations
>>
>> I already proposed a patch and none here discussed. You rather
>> preferred to shout "PHP doesn't need Annotations" instead of discuss
>> the patch that was proposed.
>
> If someone doesn't agree that annotations belong in PHP why do the detail=
s
> of the patch matter?

The actual concern is that someone didn't agree with that and (re-read
the thread to comment this), also confirmed that never used
Annotations and have a "very superficial knowledge" of the
possibilities, than to me it's more than clear to me that it's not a
valid opinion. If it is for you, then PHP has a problem.

>
>> PS: I think that internals mailing list should be revised with all
>> proposed ideas and wrap them on a better plan.
>> It seems to me that you are not interested on user's request and
>> rather accept/implement only what the features that interest you. It's
>> very bad for the language and very bad for all of users.
>
> That's simply not true. But just because one group of users feel strongly
> about something doesn't mean it should go in. There has to be some level =
of
> curation or we end up with every feature under the sun resulting in a hug=
e
> mess.

Are you sure?
Please take a look at every topic defined on wiki page. Is there ANY
topic to be discussed that came from userland?
If you say yes, please point me to the thread. What I clearly see
there is that every feature defined there came from users with php-src
karma.
Now I re-ask you, are you really sure it's only a small group that
want something or do you now confirm that only php-src users have
relevance on features request?

>
> -Rasmus
>



--=20
Guilherme Blanco
Mobile: +55 (16) 9215-8480
MSN: guilhermeblanco@hotmail.com
S=C3=A3o Paulo - SP/Brazil