Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52160 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 73605 invoked from network); 9 May 2011 17:22:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2011 17:22:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=derick@php.net; spf=unknown; sender-id=unknown Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=derick@php.net; sender-id=unknown Received-SPF: unknown (pb1.pair.com: domain php.net does not designate 82.113.146.227 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: derick@php.net X-Host-Fingerprint: 82.113.146.227 xdebug.org Linux 2.6 Received: from [82.113.146.227] ([82.113.146.227:36264] helo=xdebug.org) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 6C/7B-20726-0D228CD4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 13:22:26 -0400 Received: from localhost (xdebug.org [127.0.0.1]) by xdebug.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE880DE13D; Mon, 9 May 2011 18:22:21 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:22:21 +0100 (BST) X-X-Sender: derick@whisky To: Marcelo Gornstein cc: Stas Malyshev , "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" , PHP Internals In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> <4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com> <4DC81ED6.1050902@sugarcrm.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again From: derick@php.net (Derick Rethans) On Mon, 9 May 2011, Marcelo Gornstein wrote: > mm i don't remember saying anything like that :) i dont want to start > an argument here, but maybe you'd like to take things less personal > and re-read my post. > > anyway, i think it's time to stop just saying "no", and really > collaborate with what the community is suggesting (and already > propsed) in order to bring this into php (5.4 or whatever). Read what Richard just wrote please: > That's what Open Source is all > about. If you don't like the feature, or it is missing one, _DO_ > something about it. Saying that the developers are "not interested" > isn't really doing anything. > You really can't expect volunteers to simply down tools from family, > life, paid work to jump through hoops, attempting to make sense of > every user's request. No matter how loud they shout. cheers, Derick -- http://derickrethans.nl | http://xdebug.org Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: http://xdebug.org/donate.php twitter: @derickr and @xdebug