Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52157
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.210.170 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=FKDrOrhAf5PfQfylvin/ZWHm9m7L6D3RtOLWmV09Imm0gO6WsBNpe9GcflrHuNWEZJ
         Q/ATohdexdGF51l5cybQmewfolYxKjzqLBYE6JUqIYQL2daDSg/8fo0RTMgdyxGYnstX
         ItPOACapGA3OjZBrodvNi39G/wy/gVqCSH/FY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4DC81ED6.1050902@sugarcrm.com>
References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com>
	<4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com>
	<4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com>
	<BANLkTinn3+MCrSd7BAJCU03FMkuRAeydvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com>
	<BANLkTi=K8vc3wvwkKVtLS9o0Oh0itB_dTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC81ED6.1050902@sugarcrm.com>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 14:19:50 -0300
Message-ID: <BANLkTikhJ1Z0Gk-cSivoFBFs1Fx8CHz=mA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>
Cc: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] annotations again
From: marcelog@gmail.com (Marcelo Gornstein)

mm i don't remember saying anything like that :) i dont want to start
an argument here, but maybe you'd like to take things less personal
and re-read my post.

anyway, i think it's time to stop just saying "no", and really
collaborate with what the community is suggesting (and already
propsed) in order to bring this into php (5.4 or whatever).



On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com> wrot=
e:
> Hi!
>
>> my question is: is php a language made for the php developers that
>> mantain the language or for the community that uses them and
>> contributes to it everyday?
>
> Please stop trying to manipulate developers by suggesting if they don't d=
o
> exactly what you want they hate (or don't care for) all users. This is
> obviously not true and does not contribute to the discussion.
>
> As for the merits of the question, the problem is not having annotations =
in
> general but having consistent, easy, performant model and implementation
> that makes sense together with the rest of PHP. So far none that were
> offered were good enough to satisfy that requirement and gather consensus=
. I
> think it's better to wait and revisit it in the future than to rush a
> half-baked concept now. Which means unless somebody makes really strong
> proposal right now that people would instantly like - it's not 5.4. It
> doesn't mean "never" either - it can always be done in the next version. =
If
> there's something new to say on the topic - great, let's see it.
> --
> Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect
> SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/
> (408)454-6900 ext. 227
>



--=20

--
// I don't sleep. I coffee.
"Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstei=
n
"The class object inherits from Chuck Norris."
"Chuck Norris can divide by zero and can unit test an entire
application with a single assert."
"There=E2=80=99s a lot of work happening behind the scenes, courtesy of the
Spring AOP framework"
"Why do I have this nagging hunch that you have no idea what you're doing?"
"Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little
security will deserve neither and lose both" - Benjamin Franklin