Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52151
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: error (pb1.pair.com: domain lerdorf.com from 209.85.212.173 cause and error)
Message-ID: <4DC819D0.5010008@lerdorf.com>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 09:44:00 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "guilhermeblanco@gmail.com" <guilhermeblanco@gmail.com>
CC: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, 
 PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> <BANLkTinn3+MCrSd7BAJCU03FMkuRAeydvA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinn3+MCrSd7BAJCU03FMkuRAeydvA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
From: rasmus@lerdorf.com (Rasmus Lerdorf)

On 05/09/2011 07:44 AM, guilhermeblanco@gmail.com wrote:
> - Annotations
>
> I already proposed a patch and none here discussed. You rather
> preferred to shout "PHP doesn't need Annotations" instead of discuss
> the patch that was proposed.

If someone doesn't agree that annotations belong in PHP why do the 
details of the patch matter?

> PS: I think that internals mailing list should be revised with all
> proposed ideas and wrap them on a better plan.
> It seems to me that you are not interested on user's request and
> rather accept/implement only what the features that interest you. It's
> very bad for the language and very bad for all of users.

That's simply not true. But just because one group of users feel 
strongly about something doesn't mean it should go in. There has to be 
some level of curation or we end up with every feature under the sun 
resulting in a huge mess.

-Rasmus