Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52145 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 5009 invoked from network); 9 May 2011 08:38:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2011 08:38:14 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.133 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.133 smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.133] ([67.192.241.133:45400] helo=smtp133.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 40/62-20726-4F7A7CD4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 04:38:14 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp23.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id C782B2F82C7; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:38:09 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp23.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 63DF22F81FA; Mon, 9 May 2011 04:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DC7A7F0.4000504@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 01:38:08 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rasmus Lerdorf CC: PHP Internals References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > I see the array shortcuts are on your todo discussion list there. We > probably shouldn't get into a full discussion on that since it will span > hundreds of messages. But if any of the folks who voted no last time > around have changed their minds, it would be good to know. And before > deciding, try using MongoDB from PHP for a couple of weeks. :) I agree on both discussion point and MongoDB point :) I think for things that were already discussed extensively it makes sense to have a vote in case people changed their minds and discuss at length only if they have something new to say - like proposing new approach to the problem - which is this case probably won't happen. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227