Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52144
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=vPDNNGhUU3V98bXm0rtwg8gALyGntIAdRLXYFNvrNtbIO2nLbnknnSwiEn57KNlLdQ
         TKDmtHbgNGkWwA+M7xWaVqpqcEFu598OyZWysftHYsxEfU+/n5r8KpKvqWhSWbGgOMXc
         Jbq4HUzcArByK/yv/1qvySJuKT9LunuMJlAew=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: tyra3l@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <4D53AF3A-BAFA-4816-9C06-694C0435D88A@stefan-marr.de>
References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com>
	<4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com>
	<BANLkTinz_W2oHODz8E7naVjzUZhYtRi8TA@mail.gmail.com>
	<4DC79CB9.6090201@sugarcrm.com>
	<4D53AF3A-BAFA-4816-9C06-694C0435D88A@stefan-marr.de>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 10:04:17 +0200
Message-ID: <BANLkTikBZDO-RKDMyiBP_hfKfARuLWrJLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stefan Marr <php@stefan-marr.de>
Cc: Stas Malyshev <smalyshev@sugarcrm.com>, PHP Internals <internals@lists.php.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0f983928ff04a2d34953
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again
From: info@tyrael.hu (Ferenc Kovacs)

--0016e65a0f983928ff04a2d34953
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Stefan Marr <php@stefan-marr.de> wrote:

> Hi:
>
> On 09 May 2011, at 09:50, Stas Malyshev wrote:
>
> > I'm all for this idea, but the question is - can we have a good design &
> implementation in next 2 months? If we can, great, if we can't - I'd rather
> have 5.4 than wait for it. E.g., if we have somebody ready to commit for
> certain timeframe to come up with it, then it makes sense to discuss it in
> this context.
>
> Can't we just draw this arbitrary line in the sand, and say from now on,
> controversial things are taken out and nothing new is added anymore?
>
> Everything which is not yet in trunk and is not required to round up the
> release should go into the release after 5.4?
>
> For me it seems there is no progress because there is still to much
> opportunity to improve things...
> So, instead of allowing to nominate new features, it might be best to stick
> to what we have now, and restrict ourselves to sort out the controversial
> stuff.
>
>
I think that it would be nice to have a short timeframe before feature
freeze.

Tyrael

--0016e65a0f983928ff04a2d34953--