Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52141 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 95833 invoked from network); 9 May 2011 07:50:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 May 2011 07:50:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=smalyshev@sugarcrm.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain sugarcrm.com designates 67.192.241.163 as permitted sender) X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 67.192.241.163 smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com Linux 2.6 Received: from [67.192.241.163] ([67.192.241.163:55497] helo=smtp163.dfw.emailsrvr.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 67/D0-20726-CBC97CD4 for ; Mon, 09 May 2011 03:50:21 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp26.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4C3D8802F5; Mon, 9 May 2011 03:50:18 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp26.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: smalyshev-AT-sugarcrm.com) with ESMTPSA id 0B43F80296; Mon, 9 May 2011 03:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4DC79CB9.6090201@sugarcrm.com> Date: Mon, 09 May 2011 00:50:17 -0700 Organization: SugarCRM User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ferenc Kovacs CC: PHP Internals References: <4DC729EE.9090600@sugarcrm.com> <4DC75FFF.40008@lerdorf.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] 5.4 again From: smalyshev@sugarcrm.com (Stas Malyshev) Hi! > another thing that I would love to see on the list: named parameters. > it was recently brought up, and I think that the original argument for > the rejection isn't true anymore: > http://www.php.net/~derick/meeting-notes.html#named-parameters > adding naming parameters would actually help to make clean and > maintainable code. I'm all for this idea, but the question is - can we have a good design & implementation in next 2 months? If we can, great, if we can't - I'd rather have 5.4 than wait for it. E.g., if we have somebody ready to commit for certain timeframe to come up with it, then it makes sense to discuss it in this context. -- Stanislav Malyshev, Software Architect SugarCRM: http://www.sugarcrm.com/ (408)454-6900 ext. 227