Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52115
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.160.42 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: bad
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:mime-version:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to:to
         :references:message-id:x-mailer;
        b=Edo888lqaT6TgHBn5DOTqXQcBfztD5ZMgIGFYoOanPThbq3zUFGGpKejaV6nS5oT39
         5E64wQY/bYYsst2wCEakIOJL3eLCnSqMSpi967sqa99j7kmSUYA+VfCnLVPNSwfpanaV
         fuG9DClsZ2LPpQhsnoU+8njMAJv6b/oqxnofg=
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-15--535478097
Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:47:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinDvk=ZMvL7eis-a6SSme6DXiY=0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Internals Mailing List <internals@lists.php.net>
References: <BANLkTimtRdY_+Jj46jFEqkseuz7WD1ZPZQ@mail.gmail.com> <4DBC2D1B.10302@lerdorf.com> <4DBC4885.7010209@sugarcrm.com> <4DBC4C9A.2050502@lerdorf.com> <BANLkTikfWW=gczOf3a2c2wQ=bqSJBZH0qg@mail.gmail.com> <D83F347D-4BA3-4D8F-8448-269011CED409@gmail.com> <BANLkTinDvk=ZMvL7eis-a6SSme6DXiY=0g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <7FC73036-1493-43D5-A593-17B70E05D312@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Change Request: Make PDO default to not emulate prepared statements for MySQL
From: shadda@gmail.com (Matt Wilson)

--Apple-Mail-15--535478097
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii

Actually, I'm talking out my ass. I know it's some version prior to 2005 =
and I'm only guessing I meant SP3. I don't work on it, i've just heard =
the number 3 thrown around with it. I'll remove myself from the =
conversation before I make a larger fool of myself :)

On Apr 30, 2011, at 1:44 PM, Ferenc Kovacs wrote:

>=20
>=20
> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Matt Wilson <shadda@gmail.com> wrote:
> Really would depend on the user. Part of my company still runs on =
SQLServer 2003, for instance...
>=20
> Corporate infrastructure rarely sees upgrades. Your cousin with the =
wordpress fetish, on the other hand...
>=20
>=20
> what is SQLServer 2003?
> can't see that on http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SQL_Server
> btw. SQLServer has more enterprise level lifecycle:
> http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3D2852
> http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?p1=3D2852
>=20
> it's much longer than the mysql 2 years after first GA + 3 years =
extended support.
> =
http://www.mysqlperformanceblog.com/2008/08/22/mysql-end-of-life-eol-polic=
y/
>=20
> so imo enterprise doesn't mean that you run EOLed version, but that =
you have longer support so you can upgrade less frequently.
> for example PCI-DSS mandates:
> "All critical systems must have the most recently released software =
patches to prevent exploitation.=20
> Organizations should apply patches to less-critical systems as soon as =
possible, based on a risk-based vulnerability management program."
>=20
> I don't see why can't we change this for php-next.
> That would still give us time to document the change and for the users =
to take actions.
> I don't think that many people who uses 5.0 when php-next get released =
would be eager to upgrade.
>=20
> Tyrael
>=20
> Tyrael
>=20


--Apple-Mail-15--535478097--