Newsgroups: php.internals
Path: news.php.net
Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52045
Return-Path: <h.reindl@thelounge.net>
Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm
Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net
Received: (qmail 41152 invoked from network); 28 Apr 2011 08:31:31 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 28 Apr 2011 08:31:31 -0000
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=h.reindl@thelounge.net; sender-id=pass
Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=h.reindl@thelounge.net; spf=pass; sender-id=pass
Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain thelounge.net designates 91.118.73.15 as permitted sender)
X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: h.reindl@thelounge.net
X-Host-Fingerprint: 91.118.73.15 mail.thelounge.net Windows 98 (1)
Received: from [91.118.73.15] ([91.118.73.15:50362] helo=mail.thelounge.net)
	by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP
	id D4/72-28716-7D529BD4 for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 04:31:29 -0400
Received: from [10.0.0.99] (rh.thelounge.net [10.0.0.99])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by mail.thelounge.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F335DD1
	for <internals@lists.php.net>; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:31:16 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4DB925D4.5090107@thelounge.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:31:16 +0200
Organization: the lounge interactive design
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110421 Fedora/3.1.9-2.fc14 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: internals@lists.php.net
References: <AANLkTimDdM4Udx53qW8jU4NuP3kU8+vmU6y4ZgXRVn+X@mail.gmail.com>	<BANLkTinMW_iqqOPJCuLnCB+-VEKxapPdGg@mail.gmail.com> <4DB923E6.3020307@sugarcrm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4DB923E6.3020307@sugarcrm.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
OpenPGP: id=7F780279;
	url=http://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enigDF9D1924995EBFA02BBE4852"
Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] [RFC] Return type-hint
From: h.reindl@thelounge.net (Reindl Harald)

--------------enigDF9D1924995EBFA02BBE4852
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 28.04.2011 10:23, schrieb Stas Malyshev:

> But why would I want to see these errors?=20
> How they would make anything easier or better?

to find problems before your users?

i do not know what you want, but i want with
"error_reporting =3D E_ALL | E_STRICT" get noticed if
something possible is unclean

it is the same as for functions - so what is the difference
between the following? the first one can get a empty string
and will not notice you and ignore the foreach

the second one will produce an error if empty string is given
while an empty array would be accepted

function bla($arr)
{
 if(!empty($arr))
 {
  foreach($arr)
  {
  }
 }
}

function bla(array $arr)
{
 if(!empty($arr))
 {
  foreach($arr)
  {
  }
 }
}




--------------enigDF9D1924995EBFA02BBE4852
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk25JdQACgkQhmBjz394AnnQjwCfcG0cgmokmzJqx7I/13CC598m
vl8AoJQAczhhgHnAxTYayg4/lXnzI/8s
=Xhx3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enigDF9D1924995EBFA02BBE4852--