Newsgroups: php.internals Path: news.php.net Xref: news.php.net php.internals:52029 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact internals-help@lists.php.net; run by ezmlm Delivered-To: mailing list internals@lists.php.net Received: (qmail 31172 invoked from network); 27 Apr 2011 13:37:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO lists.php.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 27 Apr 2011 13:37:26 -0000 Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com smtp.mail=doctorrock83@gmail.com; spf=pass; sender-id=pass Authentication-Results: pb1.pair.com header.from=doctorrock83@gmail.com; sender-id=pass; domainkeys=bad Received-SPF: pass (pb1.pair.com: domain gmail.com designates 209.85.212.42 as permitted sender) DomainKey-Status: bad X-DomainKeys: Ecelerity dk_validate implementing draft-delany-domainkeys-base-01 X-PHP-List-Original-Sender: doctorrock83@gmail.com X-Host-Fingerprint: 209.85.212.42 mail-vw0-f42.google.com Received: from [209.85.212.42] ([209.85.212.42:39492] helo=mail-vw0-f42.google.com) by pb1.pair.com (ecelerity 2.1.1.9-wez r(12769M)) with ESMTP id 1C/14-04612-51C18BD4 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:37:25 -0400 Received: by vwl1 with SMTP id 1so1419006vwl.29 for ; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:37:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=Gn/oSDt5mdeh1x9TbL4+++KudYfcVfwBVYLSfyWt3R8=; b=xmQOwrmdnp5eGAJ/2QEKPlMNqesE1BZx6GRpvClUqJMI0+RGe1+h1Z3y/AuOWoEqWl rXsIwPA5jJAqa5HD7QkWaO+ktOuRG6ud6SrAr5qdh/Xlwm2CN++bTYzhdU6zwy7Uhnn3 Xu7kkRhjX5EOwvAFCjayBSXAvEt+brnftVd4Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; b=EdwmuRepVh8V/nkPQ18FLmuoDvo0XzBcZzM+OE3yvMe1rztSDuQsQcl67dbBEmBdGK 7zCYeN2x9waR4T6l+c6rBXG45dcidYe2CIPWLq/RkP3UtQViV3u+VarEw7fEvduzVlLc C0jy5lEOMujBnfn0lfn1a5csENjEzKPjmVaI4= Received: by 10.220.91.78 with SMTP id l14mr692472vcm.76.1303911442298; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:37:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: doctorrock83@gmail.com Received: by 10.220.192.75 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Apr 2011 06:36:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4DB20A65.1030504@schlueters.de> <4DB41D25.3040505@lerdorf.com> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 15:36:42 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mTGERpdppI1lkiT6MYWbe9sfRBY Message-ID: To: Pierre Joye Cc: Rasmus Lerdorf , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Johannes_Schl=FCter?= , PHP internals list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016369c89f756387f04a1e68ade Subject: Re: [PHP-DEV] Unmaintained SAPIs From: jpauli@php.net (Julien Pauli) --0016369c89f756387f04a1e68ade Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm +1 with that list. I'd like to have some time to work on a lighttpd sapi if possible (haven't seen lighttpd API yet). If someone got the same idea, just tell it... What about apache2filter SAPI ? Julien.P 2011/4/24 Pierre Joye > 2011/4/24 Rasmus Lerdorf : > > On 4/24/11 4:41 AM, Pierre Joye wrote: > >> > >> hi, > >> > >> Do we really need apache 1.x SAPIs? > >> > >> ISAPI should be kept in (was decided so by the 5.3.0 release time), it > >> is still used and works for users with custom versions. A new version > >> may come as well, as part of one of some features I'm working on. > > > > Your argument for ISAPI applies exactly to Apache 1 as well. > > Not that it is so important (does not hurt anyone to keep it in) but > apache 1.x is dead, not IIS :). > > Cheers, > -- > Pierre > > @pierrejoye | http://blog.thepimp.net | http://www.libgd.org > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > > --0016369c89f756387f04a1e68ade--